RE: ✗ i915.CI.Full: failure for tests/intel/gem_exec_balancer: Decrease required load in `full` test

[Ravali, JupallyX]

Hi,
 
https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/series/142734/- Re-reported.
 
Xe.CI.Full - Addressed failures, Xe cannot be re-reported.
i915.CI.Full - Re-reported.
 
Thanks,
Ravali

-----Original Message-----
From: I915-ci-infra <i915-ci-infra-bounces at lists.freedesktop.org> On Behalf Of Sebastian Brzezinka
Sent: 20 December 2024 16:06
To: igt-dev at lists.freedesktop.org
Cc: i915-ci-infra at lists.freedesktop.org
Subject: Re: ✗ i915.CI.Full: failure for tests/intel/gem_exec_balancer: Decrease required load in `full` test

On 2024-12-19 at 07:59:58 +0000, Patchwork wrote:
> == Series Details ==
> 
> Series: tests/intel/gem_exec_balancer: Decrease required load in `full` test
> URL   : https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/series/142734/
> State : failure
> 
> == Summary ==
> 
> CI Bug Log - changes from CI_DRM_15865_full -> IGTPW_12338_full 
> ====================================================
> 
> Summary
> -------
> 
>   **FAILURE**
> 
>   Serious unknown changes coming with IGTPW_12338_full absolutely need to be
>   verified manually.
>   
>   If you think the reported changes have nothing to do with the changes
>   introduced in IGTPW_12338_full, please notify your bug team (I915-ci-infra at lists.freedesktop.org) to allow them
>   to document this new failure mode, which will reduce false positives in CI.
> 
>   External URL: 
> https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/IGTPW_12338/index.html
> 
> Participating hosts (11 -> 11)
> ------------------------------
> 
>   No changes in participating hosts
> 
> Possible new issues
> -------------------
> 
>   Here are the unknown changes that may have been introduced in IGTPW_12338_full:
> 
> ### IGT changes ###
> 
> #### Possible regressions ####
> 
>   * igt at gem_eio@in-flight-suspend:
>     - shard-glk:          NOTRUN -> [INCOMPLETE][1]
>    [1]: 
> https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/IGTPW_12338/shard-glk2/igt@ge
> m_eio at in-flight-suspend.html
> 
>   * igt at gem_exec_balancer@full-late:
>     - shard-dg2:          [PASS][2] -> [FAIL][3]
>    [2]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_15865/shard-dg2-1/igt@gem_exec_balancer@full-late.html
>    [3]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/IGTPW_12338/shard-dg2-6/igt@gem_exec_balancer@full-late.html
>     - shard-dg1:          [PASS][4] -> [FAIL][5]
>    [4]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_15865/shard-dg1-17/igt@gem_exec_balancer@full-late.html
>    [5]: 
> https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/IGTPW_12338/shard-dg1-17/igt@
> gem_exec_balancer at full-late.html
> 
>   * igt at gem_exec_schedule@wide:
>     - shard-tglu:         [PASS][6] -> [INCOMPLETE][7] +1 other test incomplete
>    [6]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_15865/shard-tglu-4/igt@gem_exec_schedule@wide.html
>    [7]: 
> https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/IGTPW_12338/shard-tglu-2/igt@
> gem_exec_schedule at wide.html
> 
>   * igt at gem_tiled_swapping@non-threaded:
>     - shard-tglu:         NOTRUN -> [FAIL][8]
>    [8]: 
> https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/IGTPW_12338/shard-tglu-3/igt@
> gem_tiled_swapping at non-threaded.html
> 
>   * igt at i915_pm_rpm@debugfs-forcewake-user:
>     - shard-rkl:          NOTRUN -> [SKIP][9] +1 other test skip
>    [9]: 
> https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/IGTPW_12338/shard-rkl-4/igt@i
> 915_pm_rpm at debugfs-forcewake-user.html
> 
>   

These are not related to my change, Please re-run.
Thank you.

--
Best regards,
Sebastian Brzezinka