RE: ✗ Fi.CI.IGT: failure for tests/intel/xe_exec_atomic: fix basic-inc-all

[Illipilli, TejasreeX]

Hi,

https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/series/129279/ - Re-reported

Thanks,
Tejasree

-----Original Message-----
From: Kamil Konieczny <kamil.konieczny at linux.intel.com> 
Sent: Thursday, February 1, 2024 5:53 PM
To: igt-dev at lists.freedesktop.org
Cc: I915-ci-infra at lists.freedesktop.org; LGCI Bug Filing <lgci.bug.filing at intel.com>; Illipilli, TejasreeX <tejasreex.illipilli at intel.com>
Subject: Re: ✗ Fi.CI.IGT: failure for tests/intel/xe_exec_atomic: fix basic-inc-all

Hi igt-dev,
On 2024-02-01 at 05:31:28 -0000, Patchwork wrote:
> == Series Details ==
> 
> Series: tests/intel/xe_exec_atomic: fix basic-inc-all
> URL   : https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/series/129279/
> State : failure
> 
> == Summary ==
> 
> CI Bug Log - changes from CI_DRM_14192_full -> IGTPW_10600_full 
> ====================================================
> 
> Summary
> -------
> 
>   **FAILURE**
> 
>   Serious unknown changes coming with IGTPW_10600_full absolutely need to be
>   verified manually.
>   
>   If you think the reported changes have nothing to do with the changes
>   introduced in IGTPW_10600_full, please notify your bug team (I915-ci-infra at lists.freedesktop.org) to allow them
>   to document this new failure mode, which will reduce false positives in CI.
> 
>   External URL: 
> https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/IGTPW_10600/index.html
> 
> Participating hosts (8 -> 8)
> ------------------------------
> 
>   No changes in participating hosts
> 
> Possible new issues
> -------------------
> 
>   Here are the unknown changes that may have been introduced in IGTPW_10600_full:
> 
> ### IGT changes ###
> 
> #### Possible regressions ####
> 
>   * igt at gem_exec_suspend@basic-s3-devices at smem:
>     - shard-tglu:         [PASS][1] -> [ABORT][2] +1 other test abort
>    [1]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_14192/shard-tglu-5/igt@gem_exec_suspend@basic-s3-devices@smem.html
>    [2]: 
> https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/IGTPW_10600/shard-tglu-9/igt@
> gem_exec_suspend at basic-s3-devices@smem.html
> 
>   * igt at kms_flip@blocking-absolute-wf_vblank at d-hdmi-a2:
>     - shard-dg2:          NOTRUN -> [INCOMPLETE][3]
>    [3]: 
> https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/IGTPW_10600/shard-dg2-3/igt@k
> ms_flip at blocking-absolute-wf_vblank@d-hdmi-a2.html
> 
>   * igt at kms_pm_rpm@cursor:
>     - shard-tglu:         [PASS][4] -> [INCOMPLETE][5]
>    [4]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_14192/shard-tglu-7/igt@kms_pm_rpm@cursor.html
>    [5]: 
> https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/IGTPW_10600/shard-tglu-8/igt@
> kms_pm_rpm at cursor.html
> 
>   * igt at sysfs_heartbeat_interval@nopreempt at vcs0:
>     - shard-glk:          [PASS][6] -> [FAIL][7]
>    [6]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_14192/shard-glk3/igt@sysfs_heartbeat_interval@nopreempt@vcs0.html
>    [7]: 
> https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/IGTPW_10600/shard-glk8/igt@sy
> sfs_heartbeat_interval at nopreempt@vcs0.html
> 

Unrelated to Xe test change, no need for respin (patch already merged).

Regards,
Kamil

>   
> Known issues
> ------------
> 
>   Here are the changes found in IGTPW_10600_full that come from known issues:
> 

...cut...

> 
> Build changes
> -------------
> 
>   * CI: CI-20190529 -> None
>   * IGT: IGT_7698 -> IGTPW_10600
> 
>   CI-20190529: 20190529
>   CI_DRM_14192: f4c0dac89bd3cd02a1afe5e7a91ed4bf8de4afc6 @ git://anongit.freedesktop.org/gfx-ci/linux
>   IGTPW_10600: 10600
>   IGT_7698: af750f5e7eaad98d40d8c924eb5f05e99d3c668b @ 
> https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/igt-gpu-tools.git
> 
> == Logs ==
> 
> For more details see: 
> https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/IGTPW_10600/index.html