[PATCH i-g-t] tests/intel/xe_pm: Test to validate vm bind functionality with suspend and resume.
Rodrigo Vivi
rodrigo.vivi at intel.com
Fri Feb 23 20:43:48 UTC 2024
On Fri, Feb 23, 2024 at 12:21:36PM +0530, sai.gowtham.ch at intel.com wrote:
> From: Sai Gowtham Ch <sai.gowtham.ch at intel.com>
>
> Test validates vm bind functionality, by suspend and resuming the device
> before and after binding VM to a VA.
>
> Signed-off-by: Sai Gowtham Ch <sai.gowtham.ch at intel.com>
> ---
> tests/intel/xe_pm.c | 92 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> 1 file changed, 92 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/tests/intel/xe_pm.c b/tests/intel/xe_pm.c
> index a0045da0b..f9d2ce421 100644
> --- a/tests/intel/xe_pm.c
> +++ b/tests/intel/xe_pm.c
> @@ -550,9 +550,96 @@ static void test_mmap(device_t device, uint32_t placement, uint32_t flags)
> close(fw_handle);
> }
>
> +/**
> + * SUBTEST: vm-bind
> + * Description: Validate vm bind functionality with suspend and resume
> + * Functionality: pm
> + * Run type: FULL
> + */
> +static void vm_bind(device_t device, struct drm_xe_engine_class_instance *eci)
> +{
> + struct drm_xe_sync sync = {
> + .type = DRM_XE_SYNC_TYPE_SYNCOBJ,
> + .flags = DRM_XE_SYNC_FLAG_SIGNAL,
> + };
> + struct drm_xe_exec exec = {
> + .num_batch_buffer = 1,
> + .num_syncs = 1,
> + .syncs = to_user_pointer(&sync),
> + };
> + struct data {
> + uint32_t batch[16];
> + uint32_t data;
> + uint64_t addr;
> + } *data;
> + uint32_t vm;
> + uint32_t exec_queue;
> + uint32_t bind_engine;
> + uint32_t syncobj;
> + size_t bo_size;
> + int value = 0x123456;
> + uint64_t addr = 0x100000;
> + uint32_t bo = 0;
> + int b = 0;
> + uint64_t batch_offset = (char *)&(data->batch) - (char *)data;
> + uint64_t batch_addr = addr + batch_offset;
> + uint64_t sdi_offset = (char *)&(data->data) - (char *)data;
> + uint64_t sdi_addr = addr + sdi_offset;
> +
> + syncobj = syncobj_create(device.fd_xe, 0);
> + sync.handle = syncobj;
> +
> + vm = xe_vm_create(device.fd_xe, 0, 0);
> + bo_size = sizeof(*data);
> + bo_size = xe_bb_size(device.fd_xe, bo_size);
> +
> + bo = xe_bo_create(device.fd_xe, vm, bo_size,
> + vram_if_possible(device.fd_xe, eci->gt_id),
> + DRM_XE_GEM_CREATE_FLAG_NEEDS_VISIBLE_VRAM);
> +
> + exec_queue = xe_exec_queue_create(device.fd_xe, vm, eci, 0);
> + bind_engine = xe_bind_exec_queue_create(device.fd_xe, vm, 0);
> + xe_vm_bind_async(device.fd_xe, vm, bind_engine, bo, 0, addr, bo_size, &sync, 1);
> + igt_system_suspend_autoresume(SUSPEND_STATE_MEM, SUSPEND_TEST_NONE);
this is the only thing new here, a S3 right after the async vm_bind.
for this we can only introduce a new option to test_exec and add this line there,
withouth having to recreate the function.
But I also don't believe that the goal is only to test this,
but a combination of VM_BIND operations and how they survive to the
suspend states.
So, we do need a new function, but to test a combination of the
vm_bind operations against the combination of the suspend states:
* - %DRM_XE_VM_BIND_OP_MAP
* - %DRM_XE_VM_BIND_OP_UNMAP
* - %DRM_XE_VM_BIND_OP_MAP_USERPTR
* - %DRM_XE_VM_BIND_OP_UNMAP_ALL
* - %DRM_XE_VM_BIND_OP_PREFETCH
vs the already defined s_states and d_states
> + data = xe_bo_map(device.fd_xe, bo, bo_size);
> +
> + b = 0;
> + data->batch[b++] = MI_STORE_DWORD_IMM_GEN4;
> + data->batch[b++] = sdi_addr;
> + data->batch[b++] = sdi_addr >> 32;
> + data->batch[b++] = value;
> + data->batch[b++] = MI_BATCH_BUFFER_END;
> + igt_assert(b <= ARRAY_SIZE(data->batch));
> +
> + exec.exec_queue_id = exec_queue;
> + exec.address = batch_addr;
> + sync.flags &= DRM_XE_SYNC_FLAG_SIGNAL;
> + xe_exec(device.fd_xe, &exec);
> +
> + igt_assert(syncobj_wait(device.fd_xe, &syncobj, 1, INT64_MAX, 0, NULL));
> + igt_assert_eq(data->data, value);
> + igt_system_suspend_autoresume(SUSPEND_STATE_MEM, SUSPEND_TEST_NONE);
> +
> + exec.exec_queue_id = exec_queue;
> + exec.address = batch_addr;
> + sync.flags &= DRM_XE_SYNC_FLAG_SIGNAL;
> + xe_exec(device.fd_xe, &exec);
> +
> + igt_assert(syncobj_wait(device.fd_xe, &syncobj, 1, INT64_MAX, 0, NULL));
> + igt_assert_eq(data->data, value);
> +
> + syncobj_destroy(device.fd_xe, syncobj);
> + munmap(data, bo_size);
> + gem_close(device.fd_xe, bo);
> +
> + xe_exec_queue_destroy(device.fd_xe, exec_queue);
> + xe_vm_destroy(device.fd_xe, vm);
> +}
> +
> igt_main
> {
> struct drm_xe_engine_class_instance *hwe;
> + struct drm_xe_engine *engine;
> device_t device;
> uint32_t d3cold_allowed;
> int sysfs_fd;
> @@ -693,6 +780,11 @@ igt_main
> }
> }
>
> + igt_subtest("vm-bind") {
> + engine = xe_engine(device.fd_xe, 1);
> + vm_bind(device, &engine->instance);
> + }
> +
> igt_fixture {
> close(sysfs_fd);
> igt_pm_set_d3cold_allowed(device.pci_slot_name, d3cold_allowed);
> --
> 2.39.1
>
More information about the igt-dev
mailing list