[PATCH v3 2/3] tests/xe_waitfence: Removed drm_xe_sync data in exec_queue_reset_wait
Rodrigo Vivi
rodrigo.vivi at intel.com
Thu Jan 11 14:51:16 UTC 2024
On Thu, Jan 11, 2024 at 11:55:17AM +0530, Bommu Krishnaiah wrote:
> Removed drm_xe_sync data in exec_queue_reset_wait since it was declared
> and unused,
are you sure this is unused? or this is what will force the timeout,
then reset, then the wait_user_fence to really wait to the end?
Cc: Matthew Brost
> failure Intel XE#1081
What is 'Intel XE#1081'?
>
> Signed-off-by: Bommu Krishnaiah <krishnaiah.bommu at intel.com>
> Cc: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi at intel.com>
> ---
> tests/intel/xe_waitfence.c | 8 --------
> 1 file changed, 8 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/tests/intel/xe_waitfence.c b/tests/intel/xe_waitfence.c
> index fd515a151..2f0f00cf4 100644
> --- a/tests/intel/xe_waitfence.c
> +++ b/tests/intel/xe_waitfence.c
> @@ -248,16 +248,8 @@ exec_queue_reset_wait(int fd)
> uint32_t data;
> } *data;
>
> -#define USER_FENCE_VALUE 0xdeadbeefdeadbeefull
> - struct drm_xe_sync sync[1] = {
> - { .flags = DRM_XE_SYNC_TYPE_USER_FENCE | DRM_XE_SYNC_FLAG_SIGNAL,
> - .timeline_value = USER_FENCE_VALUE },
> - };
> -
> struct drm_xe_exec exec = {
> .num_batch_buffer = 1,
> - .num_syncs = 1,
> - .syncs = to_user_pointer(sync),
> };
>
> uint32_t vm = xe_vm_create(fd, 0, 0);
> --
> 2.25.1
>
More information about the igt-dev
mailing list