[PATCH i-g-t 2/2] tests/intel/kms_psr: enable given psr mode only after checking enable_psr modparam

[Modem, Bhanuprakash]

Hi Kunal,

On 24-01-2024 04:04 pm, Kunal Joshi wrote:
> don't enable a psr mode with psr_debug debugfs, instead check what's
> the modparam value for i915_enable_psr
> 
> Signed-off-by: Kunal Joshi <kunal1.joshi at intel.com>
> Reviewed-by: Jeevan B <jeevan.b at intel.com>
> Tested-by: Vidya Srinivas <vidya.srinivas at intel.com>
> ---
>   tests/intel/kms_psr.c | 12 ++++++++++++
>   1 file changed, 12 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/tests/intel/kms_psr.c b/tests/intel/kms_psr.c
> index 349671b00..521d4c708 100644
> --- a/tests/intel/kms_psr.c
> +++ b/tests/intel/kms_psr.c
> @@ -497,16 +497,28 @@ static void fill_render(data_t *data, const struct igt_fb *fb,
>   
>   static bool psr_wait_entry_if_enabled(data_t *data)
>   {
> +	if (!is_psr_enable_possible(data->drm_fd, data->op_psr_mode))
> +		igt_skip("enable_psr modparam doesn't allow psr mode %d\n",
> +			 data->op_psr_mode);

This change will cause the skips in dynamic subtests. Skipping the 
dynamic subtest is not recommended, instead don't run the test.

So the proper place for this check would be before calling the 
igt_dynamic().

- Bhanu

> +
>   	return psr_wait_entry(data->debugfs_fd, data->op_psr_mode, data->output);
>   }
>   
>   static bool psr_wait_update_if_enabled(data_t *data)
>   {
> +	if (!is_psr_enable_possible(data->drm_fd, data->op_psr_mode))
> +		igt_skip("enable_psr modparam doesn't allow psr mode %d\n",
> +			 data->op_psr_mode);
> +
>   	return psr_wait_update(data->debugfs_fd, data->op_psr_mode, data->output);
>   }
>   
>   static bool psr_enable_if_enabled(data_t *data)
>   {
> +	if (!is_psr_enable_possible(data->drm_fd, data->op_psr_mode))
> +		igt_skip("enable_psr modparam doesn't allow psr mode %d\n",
> +			 data->op_psr_mode);
> +
>   	return psr_enable(data->drm_fd, data->debugfs_fd, data->op_psr_mode);
>   }
>