✗ CI.xeBAT: failure for lib/kunit: Support writable filter* parameters of kunit module (rev2)
Janusz Krzysztofik
janusz.krzysztofik at linux.intel.com
Wed Jan 31 19:22:35 UTC 2024
On Wednesday, 31 January 2024 19:36:57 CET Patchwork wrote:
> == Series Details ==
>
> Series: lib/kunit: Support writable filter* parameters of kunit module
(rev2)
> URL : https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/series/129174/
> State : failure
>
> == Summary ==
>
> CI Bug Log - changes from XEIGT_7699_BAT -> XEIGTPW_10613_BAT
> ====================================================
>
> Summary
> -------
>
> **FAILURE**
>
> Serious unknown changes coming with XEIGTPW_10613_BAT absolutely need to
be
> verified manually.
>
> If you think the reported changes have nothing to do with the changes
> introduced in XEIGTPW_10613_BAT, please notify your bug team (I915-ci-
infra at lists.freedesktop.org) to allow them
> to document this new failure mode, which will reduce false positives in
CI.
>
>
>
> Participating hosts (4 -> 4)
> ------------------------------
>
> No changes in participating hosts
>
> Possible new issues
> -------------------
>
> Here are the unknown changes that may have been introduced in
XEIGTPW_10613_BAT:
>
> ### IGT changes ###
>
> #### Possible regressions ####
>
> * igt at xe_live_ktest@bo:
> - bat-adlp-7: [PASS][1] -> [SKIP][2] +2 other tests skip
> [1]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/intel-xe/IGT_7699/bat-adlp-7/
igt at xe_live_ktest@bo.html
> [2]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/intel-xe/IGTPW_10613/bat-adlp-7/
igt at xe_live_ktest@bo.html
Hi Lucas,
We've got an empty list of test cases because the current algorithm of IGT
KUnit implementation expects subtest name provided via struct kunit_tests
to be the same as name of a test suite provided by the KUnit test module. As
a special case, if the module provides only one test suite (most do) and the
name of it is the same as the module name with the _test or _kunit suffix
truncated (also the most common case) then subtest name may be omitted (i.e.,
.name field may be NULL).
I have to document the above, but we also have to use the same names on both
sides (KUnit test module and its corresponding IGT test). Now we don't, e.g.
test suite named "xe_bo" is provided by xe_bo_test module while subtest name
"bo" is specified for that module in IGT xe_live_ktest.
Thanks,
Janusz
>
> * igt at xe_live_ktest@migrate:
> - bat-pvc-2: [PASS][3] -> [SKIP][4] +2 other tests skip
> [3]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/intel-xe/IGT_7699/bat-pvc-2/
igt at xe_live_ktest@migrate.html
> [4]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/intel-xe/IGTPW_10613/bat-pvc-2/
igt at xe_live_ktest@migrate.html
> - bat-dg2-oem2: [PASS][5] -> [SKIP][6] +2 other tests skip
> [5]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/intel-xe/IGT_7699/bat-dg2-oem2/
igt at xe_live_ktest@migrate.html
> [6]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/intel-xe/IGTPW_10613/bat-dg2-oem2/
igt at xe_live_ktest@migrate.html
> - bat-atsm-2: [PASS][7] -> [SKIP][8] +2 other tests skip
> [7]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/intel-xe/IGT_7699/bat-atsm-2/
igt at xe_live_ktest@migrate.html
> [8]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/intel-xe/IGTPW_10613/bat-atsm-2/
igt at xe_live_ktest@migrate.html
>
>
> Known issues
> ------------
>
> Here are the changes found in XEIGTPW_10613_BAT that come from known
issues:
>
> ### IGT changes ###
>
> #### Issues hit ####
>
> * igt at kms_addfb_basic@invalid-set-prop:
> - bat-adlp-7: [PASS][9] -> [SKIP][10] ([i915#6077]) +30 other
tests skip
> [9]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/intel-xe/IGT_7699/bat-adlp-7/
igt at kms_addfb_basic@invalid-set-prop.html
> [10]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/intel-xe/IGTPW_10613/bat-adlp-7/
igt at kms_addfb_basic@invalid-set-prop.html
>
> * igt at kms_flip@basic-flip-vs-dpms:
> - bat-adlp-7: [PASS][11] -> [SKIP][12] ([Intel XE#1219]) +9
other tests skip
> [11]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/intel-xe/IGT_7699/bat-adlp-7/
igt at kms_flip@basic-flip-vs-dpms.html
> [12]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/intel-xe/IGTPW_10613/bat-adlp-7/
igt at kms_flip@basic-flip-vs-dpms.html
>
> * igt at kms_force_connector_basic@force-connector-state:
> - bat-adlp-7: [PASS][13] -> [SKIP][14] ([Intel XE#540]) +3 other
tests skip
> [13]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/intel-xe/IGT_7699/bat-adlp-7/
igt at kms_force_connector_basic@force-connector-state.html
> [14]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/intel-xe/IGTPW_10613/bat-adlp-7/
igt at kms_force_connector_basic@force-connector-state.html
>
> * igt at kms_pipe_crc_basic@nonblocking-crc-frame-sequence:
> - bat-adlp-7: [PASS][15] -> [SKIP][16] ([Intel XE#829]) +6 other
tests skip
> [15]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/intel-xe/IGT_7699/bat-adlp-7/
igt at kms_pipe_crc_basic@nonblocking-crc-frame-sequence.html
> [16]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/intel-xe/IGTPW_10613/bat-adlp-7/
igt at kms_pipe_crc_basic@nonblocking-crc-frame-sequence.html
>
> * igt at kms_prop_blob@basic:
> - bat-adlp-7: [PASS][17] -> [SKIP][18] ([Intel XE#780])
> [17]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/intel-xe/IGT_7699/bat-adlp-7/
igt at kms_prop_blob@basic.html
> [18]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/intel-xe/IGTPW_10613/bat-adlp-7/
igt at kms_prop_blob@basic.html
>
>
> #### Possible fixes ####
>
> * igt at xe_module_load@load:
> - bat-pvc-2: [SKIP][19] ([Intel XE#378]) -> [PASS][20]
> [19]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/intel-xe/IGT_7699/bat-pvc-2/
igt at xe_module_load@load.html
> [20]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/intel-xe/IGTPW_10613/bat-pvc-2/
igt at xe_module_load@load.html
>
>
> #### Warnings ####
>
> * igt at kms_dsc@dsc-basic:
> - bat-adlp-7: [SKIP][21] ([Intel XE#455]) -> [SKIP][22] ([Intel
XE#1219])
> [21]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/intel-xe/IGT_7699/bat-adlp-7/
igt at kms_dsc@dsc-basic.html
> [22]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/intel-xe/IGTPW_10613/bat-adlp-7/
igt at kms_dsc@dsc-basic.html
>
> * igt at kms_frontbuffer_tracking@basic:
> - bat-adlp-7: [DMESG-FAIL][23] ([Intel XE#1033]) -> [SKIP][24]
([Intel XE#783])
> [23]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/intel-xe/IGT_7699/bat-adlp-7/
igt at kms_frontbuffer_tracking@basic.html
> [24]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/intel-xe/IGTPW_10613/bat-adlp-7/
igt at kms_frontbuffer_tracking@basic.html
>
>
> {name}: This element is suppressed. This means it is ignored when
computing
> the status of the difference (SUCCESS, WARNING, or FAILURE).
>
> [Intel XE#1033]: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/xe/kernel/issues/1033
> [Intel XE#1219]: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/xe/kernel/issues/1219
> [Intel XE#378]: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/xe/kernel/issues/378
> [Intel XE#455]: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/xe/kernel/issues/455
> [Intel XE#540]: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/xe/kernel/issues/540
> [Intel XE#780]: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/xe/kernel/issues/780
> [Intel XE#783]: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/xe/kernel/issues/783
> [Intel XE#829]: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/xe/kernel/issues/829
> [i915#6077]: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/issues/6077
>
>
> Build changes
> -------------
>
> * IGT: IGT_7699 -> IGTPW_10613
> * Linux: xe-699-c655e0fd28045dbaa581d04bf7cc266eec1c3457 ->
xe-711-8327dc2a5a26f82a8700035c6259f57e9299d6a2
>
> IGTPW_10613: 10613
> IGT_7699: 7699
> xe-699-c655e0fd28045dbaa581d04bf7cc266eec1c3457:
c655e0fd28045dbaa581d04bf7cc266eec1c3457
> xe-711-8327dc2a5a26f82a8700035c6259f57e9299d6a2:
8327dc2a5a26f82a8700035c6259f57e9299d6a2
>
> == Logs ==
>
> For more details see: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/intel-xe/IGTPW_10613/
index.html
>
More information about the igt-dev
mailing list