[PATCH i-g-t 3/3] lib/kunit: Improve a comment on action=list parameter

[Zbigniew Kempczyński]

On Mon, Jul 22, 2024 at 10:01:04AM +0200, Janusz Krzysztofik wrote:
> Emphasize the fact that test case list of unknown length we want to avoid
> parsing of is an unstructured free text list.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Janusz Krzysztofik <janusz.krzysztofik at linux.intel.com>
> ---
>  lib/igt_kmod.c | 8 ++++----
>  1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/lib/igt_kmod.c b/lib/igt_kmod.c
> index a13c6fe063..464c0dcf48 100644
> --- a/lib/igt_kmod.c
> +++ b/lib/igt_kmod.c
> @@ -1284,10 +1284,10 @@ static bool kunit_get_tests(struct igt_list_head *tests,
>  	/*
>  	 * To get a list of test cases provided by a kunit test module, ask the
>  	 * generic kunit module to respond with SKIP result for each test found.
> -	 * We could also use action=list kunit parameter to get the listing,
> -	 * however, parsing a KTAP report -- something that we already can do
> -	 * perfectly -- seems to be more safe than extracting a test case list
> -	 * of unknown length from /dev/kmsg.
> +	 * We could also try to use action=list kunit parameter to get the
> +	 * listing, however, parsing a structured KTAP report -- something that
> +	 * we already can do perfectly -- seems to be more safe than extracting
> +	 * a free text list of unknown length from /dev/kmsg.
>  	 */
>  	if (igt_debug_on(!kunit_set_filtering(suite, "module=none", "skip")))
>  		return false;
> -- 
> 2.45.2
> 

Reviewed-by: Zbigniew Kempczyński <zbigniew.kempczynski at intel.com>

--
Zbigniew