[PATCH] tests/intel/xe_exec_store: Modify test for Priority Mem Read feature
Pallavi Mishra
pallavi.mishra at intel.com
Wed Jul 24 19:40:06 UTC 2024
Now that KMD supports Priority Mem Read feature, care needs to
be taken to avoid RAW hazards which may get introduced due to
unordered read and writes. Inorder to prevent this insert
MI_MEM_FENCE which will ensure data coherency in such
scenarios.
KMD patch to enable Priority Mem Read:
https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/series/134038/
Signed-off-by: Pallavi Mishra <pallavi.mishra at intel.com>
---
include/intel_gpu_commands.h | 2 ++
tests/intel/xe_exec_store.c | 1 +
2 files changed, 3 insertions(+)
diff --git a/include/intel_gpu_commands.h b/include/intel_gpu_commands.h
index fe734c4bb..cd281ba89 100644
--- a/include/intel_gpu_commands.h
+++ b/include/intel_gpu_commands.h
@@ -89,6 +89,7 @@
#define MI_DISPLAY_FLIP_SKL_PLANE_3_A (7 << 8)
#define MI_DISPLAY_FLIP_SKL_PLANE_3_B (8 << 8)
#define MI_DISPLAY_FLIP_SKL_PLANE_3_C (9 << 8)
+#define MI_MEM_FENCE MI_INSTR(0x09, 0)
#define MI_SEMAPHORE_MBOX MI_INSTR(0x16, 1) /* gen6, gen7 */
#define MI_SEMAPHORE_GLOBAL_GTT (1<<22)
#define MI_SEMAPHORE_UPDATE (1<<21)
@@ -192,6 +193,7 @@
#define MI_OPCODE(x) (((x) >> 23) & 0x3f)
#define IS_MI_LRI_CMD(x) (MI_OPCODE(x) == MI_OPCODE(MI_INSTR(0x22, 0)))
#define MI_LRI_LEN(x) (((x) & 0xff) + 1)
+#define MI_WRITE_FENCE (3 << 0)
/*
* 3D instructions used by the kernel
diff --git a/tests/intel/xe_exec_store.c b/tests/intel/xe_exec_store.c
index c872c22d5..fb99e53b7 100644
--- a/tests/intel/xe_exec_store.c
+++ b/tests/intel/xe_exec_store.c
@@ -63,6 +63,7 @@ static void cond_batch(struct data *data, uint64_t addr, int value)
data->batch[b++] = MI_ATOMIC | MI_ATOMIC_INC;
data->batch[b++] = sdi_addr;
data->batch[b++] = sdi_addr >> 32;
+ data->batch[b++] = MI_MEM_FENCE | MI_WRITE_FENCE;
data->batch[b++] = MI_CONDITIONAL_BATCH_BUFFER_END | MI_DO_COMPARE | 5 << 12 | 2;
data->batch[b++] = value;
data->batch[b++] = sdi_addr;
--
2.25.1
More information about the igt-dev
mailing list