[PATCH i-g-t v2] tests/intel/xe_exec_store: Add basic_inst_benchmark
Nirmoy Das
nirmoy.das at intel.com
Thu Jun 20 14:44:44 UTC 2024
Hi Kamil,
On 6/20/2024 4:20 PM, Kamil Konieczny wrote:
> Hi Nirmoy,
> On 2024-06-18 at 19:32:47 +0200, Nirmoy Das wrote:
>
> [PATCH i-g-t v2] tests/intel/xe_exec_store: Add basic_inst_benchmark
> -----------------------------------------------------^
>
> You should use '-', also your subtest has 'store', so:
>
> [PATCH i-g-t v2] tests/intel/xe_exec_store: Add basic-store-benchmark
Will do that
>
>> Add basic_inst_benchmark to benchmark this basic operation
>> for BO sizes to get basic understanding how long it takes
>> bind a BO and run simple GPU command on it.
>>
>> This not a CI test but rather for developer to identify various
>> bottleneck/regression in BO binding.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Nirmoy Das<nirmoy.das at intel.com>
>> ---
>> tests/intel/xe_exec_store.c | 110 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------
>> 1 file changed, 92 insertions(+), 18 deletions(-)
>>
> This didn't work on my ATS-M machine:
>
> sudo build/tests/xe_exec_store --r basic-store-benchmark
> IGT-Version: 1.28-g64414e4da (x86_64) (Linux: 6.9.0-rc6-xe-public-513ea833c201+ x86_64)
> Using IGT_SRANDOM=1718890917 for randomisation
> Opened device: /dev/dri/card0
> Starting subtest: basic-store-benchmark
> Starting dynamic subtest: WC
> Dynamic subtest WC: SUCCESS (0.000s)
> (xe_exec_store:15881) xe/xe_ioctl-CRITICAL: Test assertion failure function xe_bo_create_caching, file ../lib/xe/xe_ioctl.c:311:
> (xe_exec_store:15881) xe/xe_ioctl-CRITICAL: Failed assertion: __xe_bo_create_caching(fd, vm, size, placement, flags, cpu_caching, &handle) == 0
> (xe_exec_store:15881) xe/xe_ioctl-CRITICAL: Last errno: 22, Invalid argument
> (xe_exec_store:15881) xe/xe_ioctl-CRITICAL: error: -1 != 0
I guess WC cache is not allowed on dGFX, dmesg should let us know. I
will check and fix it. Thanks for trying it out.
>
> Also, where are benchmarks? Do you print them only after
> WC and WB runs?
It should something like:
sudo~/igt-gpu-tools/build/tests/xe_exec_store --run basic-store-benchmark
IGT-Version: 1.28-g2ed908c0b (x86_64) (Linux: 6.10.0-rc2-xe+ x86_64)
Using IGT_SRANDOM=1718739607 for randomisation
Opened device: /dev/dri/card0
Starting subtest: basic-store-benchmark
Starting dynamic subtest: WC
Dynamic subtest WC: SUCCESS (0.000s)
Time taken for size SZ_4K: 8 ms
Time taken for size SZ_2M: 7 ms
Time taken for size SZ_64M: 15 ms
Time taken for size SZ_128M: 16 ms
Time taken for size SZ_256M: 33 ms
Time taken for size SZ_1G: 110 ms
Starting dynamic subtest: WB
Dynamic subtest WB: SUCCESS (0.000s)
Time taken for size SZ_4K: 4 ms
Time taken for size SZ_2M: 5 ms
Time taken for size SZ_64M: 16 ms
Time taken for size SZ_128M: 29 ms
Time taken for size SZ_256M: 49 ms
Time taken for size SZ_1G: 176 ms
Btw I realized --dyn doesn't work, the test executes WC always even with
--dyn :/ any ideas ?
> See also one nit below.
>
>> diff --git a/tests/intel/xe_exec_store.c b/tests/intel/xe_exec_store.c
>> index c872c22d5..4b1c619e0 100644
>> --- a/tests/intel/xe_exec_store.c
>> +++ b/tests/intel/xe_exec_store.c
>> @@ -93,15 +93,10 @@ static void persistance_batch(struct data *data, uint64_t addr)
>> data->addr = batch_addr;
>>
>> }
>> -/**
>> - * SUBTEST: basic-store
>> - * Description: Basic test to verify store dword.
>> - * SUBTEST: basic-cond-batch
>> - * Description: Basic test to verify cond batch end instruction.
>> - * SUBTEST: basic-all
>> - * Description: Test to verify store dword on all available engines.
>> - */
>> -static void basic_inst(int fd, int inst_type, struct drm_xe_engine_class_instance *eci)
>> +
>> +static void basic_inst_size(int fd, int inst_type,
>> + struct drm_xe_engine_class_instance *eci,
>> + uint16_t cpu_caching, size_t bo_size)
>> {
>> struct drm_xe_sync sync[2] = {
>> { .type = DRM_XE_SYNC_TYPE_SYNCOBJ, .flags = DRM_XE_SYNC_FLAG_SIGNAL, },
>> @@ -117,7 +112,6 @@ static void basic_inst(int fd, int inst_type, struct drm_xe_engine_class_instanc
>> uint32_t exec_queue;
>> uint32_t bind_engine;
>> uint32_t syncobj;
>> - size_t bo_size;
>> int value = 0x123456;
>> uint64_t addr = 0x100000;
>> uint32_t bo = 0;
>> @@ -127,12 +121,16 @@ static void basic_inst(int fd, int inst_type, struct drm_xe_engine_class_instanc
>> sync[1].handle = syncobj;
>>
>> vm = xe_vm_create(fd, 0, 0);
>> - bo_size = sizeof(*data);
>> - bo_size = xe_bb_size(fd, bo_size);
>>
>> - bo = xe_bo_create(fd, vm, bo_size,
>> - vram_if_possible(fd, eci->gt_id),
>> - DRM_XE_GEM_CREATE_FLAG_NEEDS_VISIBLE_VRAM);
>> + if (cpu_caching)
>> + bo = xe_bo_create_caching(fd, vm, bo_size,
>> + vram_if_possible(fd, eci->gt_id),
>> + DRM_XE_GEM_CREATE_FLAG_NEEDS_VISIBLE_VRAM,
>> + cpu_caching);
>> + else
>> + bo = xe_bo_create(fd, vm, bo_size,
>> + vram_if_possible(fd, eci->gt_id),
>> + DRM_XE_GEM_CREATE_FLAG_NEEDS_VISIBLE_VRAM);
>>
>> exec_queue = xe_exec_queue_create(fd, vm, eci, 0);
>> bind_engine = xe_bind_exec_queue_create(fd, vm, 0);
>> @@ -167,6 +165,66 @@ static void basic_inst(int fd, int inst_type, struct drm_xe_engine_class_instanc
>> xe_vm_destroy(fd, vm);
>> }
>>
>> +
> Remove extra line.
Will remove it.
Thanks!
Nirmoy
>
> Regards,
> Kamil
>
>> +/**
>> + * SUBTEST: basic-store
>> + * Description: Basic test to verify store dword.
>> + * SUBTEST: basic-cond-batch
>> + * Description: Basic test to verify cond batch end instruction.
>> + * SUBTEST: basic-all
>> + * Description: Test to verify store dword on all available engines.
>> + */
>> +static void basic_inst(int fd, int inst_type,
>> + struct drm_xe_engine_class_instance *eci,
>> + uint16_t cpu_caching)
>> +{
>> + size_t bo_size;
>> +
>> + bo_size = sizeof(struct data);
>> + bo_size = xe_bb_size(fd, bo_size);
>> +
>> + basic_inst_size(fd, inst_type, eci, cpu_caching, bo_size);
>> +}
>> +
>> +/**
>> + * SUBTEST: basic-store-benchmark
>> + * Description: Basic test to verify time taken for doing store dword with various size.
>> + */
>> +static void basic_inst_benchmark(int fd, int inst_type,
>> + struct drm_xe_engine_class_instance *eci,
>> + uint16_t cpu_caching)
>> +{
>> + struct {
>> + size_t size;
>> + const char *name;
>> + } sizes[] = {
>> + {SZ_4K, "SZ_4K"},
>> + {SZ_2M, "SZ_2M"},
>> + {SZ_64M, "SZ_64M"},
>> + {SZ_128M, "SZ_128M"},
>> + {SZ_256M, "SZ_256M"},
>> + {SZ_1G, "SZ_1G"}
>> + };
>> +
>> + struct timeval start, end;
>> + long seconds, useconds, mtime;
>> +
>> + for (size_t i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(sizes); ++i) {
>> + size_t bo_size = sizes[i].size;
>> + const char *size_name = sizes[i].name;
>> +
>> + gettimeofday(&start, NULL);
>> + basic_inst_size(fd, inst_type, eci, cpu_caching, bo_size);
>> + gettimeofday(&end, NULL);
>> +
>> + seconds = end.tv_sec - start.tv_sec;
>> + useconds = end.tv_usec - start.tv_usec;
>> + mtime = ((seconds) * 1000 + useconds / 1000.0) + 0.5;
>> +
>> + igt_info("Time taken for size %s: %ld ms\n", size_name, mtime);
>> + }
>> +}
>> +
>> #define PAGES 1
>> #define NCACHELINES (4096/64)
>> /**
>> @@ -342,12 +400,28 @@ igt_main
>>
>> igt_subtest("basic-store") {
>> engine = xe_engine(fd, 1);
>> - basic_inst(fd, STORE, &engine->instance);
>> + basic_inst(fd, COND_BATCH, &engine->instance, 0);
>> + }
>> +
>> + igt_subtest_with_dynamic("basic-store-benchmark") {
>> + struct dyn {
>> + const char *name;
>> + int cache;
>> + } tests[] = {
>> + {"WC", DRM_XE_GEM_CPU_CACHING_WC},
>> + {"WB", DRM_XE_GEM_CPU_CACHING_WB}
>> + };
>> +
>> + for (int i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(tests); i++) {
>> + igt_dynamic_f("%s", tests[i].name);
>> + engine = xe_engine(fd, 1);
>> + basic_inst_benchmark(fd, STORE, &engine->instance, tests[i].cache);
>> + }
>> }
>>
>> igt_subtest("basic-cond-batch") {
>> engine = xe_engine(fd, 1);
>> - basic_inst(fd, COND_BATCH, &engine->instance);
>> + basic_inst(fd, COND_BATCH, &engine->instance, 0);
>> }
>>
>> igt_subtest_with_dynamic("basic-all") {
>> @@ -356,7 +430,7 @@ igt_main
>> xe_engine_class_string(hwe->engine_class),
>> hwe->engine_instance,
>> hwe->gt_id);
>> - basic_inst(fd, STORE, hwe);
>> + basic_inst(fd, STORE, hwe, 0);
>> }
>> }
>>
>> --
>> 2.42.0
>>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/igt-dev/attachments/20240620/027349e5/attachment-0001.htm>
More information about the igt-dev
mailing list