[PATCH i-g-t v3 05/25] tests/intel: Let's introduce Workarounds subcategory
Kamil Konieczny
kamil.konieczny at linux.intel.com
Tue Mar 12 15:59:00 UTC 2024
Hi Katarzyna,
On 2024-03-12 at 14:13:59 +0000, Katarzyna Piecielska wrote:
> There is gem_workaround test that deserves it's own subcategory.
>
> Signed-off-by: Katarzyna Piecielska <katarzyna.piecielska at intel.com>
> Cc: Kamil Konieczny <kamil.konieczny at linux.intel.com>
> Cc: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mauro.chehab at linux.intel.com>
> Reviewed-by: Kamil Konieczny <kamil.konieczny at linux.intel.com>
> ---
> tests/intel/gem_workarounds.c | 4 ++--
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/tests/intel/gem_workarounds.c b/tests/intel/gem_workarounds.c
> index d83c0a1db..43146f4b9 100644
> --- a/tests/intel/gem_workarounds.c
> +++ b/tests/intel/gem_workarounds.c
> @@ -36,8 +36,8 @@
> * TEST: gem workarounds
> * Category: Infrastructure
> * Feature: workarounds
> - * Functionality: workarounds
> - * Sub-category: Context
> + * Functionality: context
> + * Sub-category: Workarounds
I did give you r-b but now that I know about names collision
it looks like Sub-category should be different from Feature,
what about:
* Sub-category: GPU_Workarounds
Regards,
Kamil
> * Test category: GEM_Legacy
> * Run type: FULL
> *
> --
> 2.34.1
>
More information about the igt-dev
mailing list