RE: ✗ Fi.CI.BAT: failure for tests/intel-ci/xe: Block pc8-residency tests on XE

[Illipilli, TejasreeX]

Hi,

https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/series/130962/ - Re-reported.

Thanks,
Tejasree

-----Original Message-----
From: Kamil Konieczny <kamil.konieczny at linux.intel.com> 
Sent: Monday, March 11, 2024 6:28 PM
To: igt-dev at lists.freedesktop.org
Cc: Modem, Bhanuprakash <bhanuprakash.modem at intel.com>; I915-ci-infra at lists.freedesktop.org; LGCI Bug Filing <lgci.bug.filing at intel.com>; Illipilli, TejasreeX <tejasreex.illipilli at intel.com>
Subject: Re: ✗ Fi.CI.BAT: failure for tests/intel-ci/xe: Block pc8-residency tests on XE

Hi igt-dev,
On 2024-03-11 at 05:48:12 -0000, Patchwork wrote:
> == Series Details ==
> 
> Series: tests/intel-ci/xe: Block pc8-residency tests on XE
> URL   : https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/series/130962/
> State : failure
> 
> == Summary ==
> 
> CI Bug Log - changes from CI_DRM_14418 -> IGTPW_10800 
> ====================================================
> 
> Summary
> -------
> 
>   **FAILURE**
> 
>   Serious unknown changes coming with IGTPW_10800 absolutely need to be
>   verified manually.
>   
>   If you think the reported changes have nothing to do with the changes
>   introduced in IGTPW_10800, please notify your bug team (I915-ci-infra at lists.freedesktop.org) to allow them
>   to document this new failure mode, which will reduce false positives in CI.
> 
>   External URL: 
> https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/IGTPW_10800/index.html
> 
> Participating hosts (31 -> 30)
> ------------------------------
> 
>   Additional (1): bat-dg1-7 
>   Missing    (2): fi-cfl-8109u fi-snb-2520m 
> 
> Possible new issues
> -------------------
> 
>   Here are the unknown changes that may have been introduced in IGTPW_10800:
> 
> ### IGT changes ###
> 
> #### Possible regressions ####
> 
>   * igt at i915_selftest@live at workarounds:
>     - bat-arls-1:         [PASS][1] -> [DMESG-WARN][2]
>    [1]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_14418/bat-arls-1/igt@i915_selftest@live@workarounds.html
>    [2]: 
> https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/IGTPW_10800/bat-arls-1/igt@i9
> 15_selftest at live@workarounds.html
> 

This is unrelated to change in ci blocklist,

Regards,
Kamil

> 

...cut...

> Build changes
> -------------
> 
>   * CI: CI-20190529 -> None
>   * IGT: IGT_7751 -> IGTPW_10800
> 
>   CI-20190529: 20190529
>   CI_DRM_14418: 2c2957bb1a0058ea85ca21d62762aa54e28aff54 @ git://anongit.freedesktop.org/gfx-ci/linux
>   IGTPW_10800: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/IGTPW_10800/index.html
>   IGT_7751: 86173d01d4d3644237f781dc5f9890bd26c988de @ 
> https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/igt-gpu-tools.git
> 
> 
> Testlist changes
> ----------------
> 
> +igt at kms_big_joiner@2x-modeset
> +igt at kms_big_joiner@basic
> +igt at kms_big_joiner@invalid-modeset
> -igt at kms_big_joiner@basic-bigjoiner
> -igt at kms_big_joiner@basic-force-joiner
> -igt at kms_big_joiner@invalid-modeset-bigjoiner
> -igt at kms_big_joiner@invalid-modeset-force-joiner
> 
> == Logs ==
> 
> For more details see: 
> https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/IGTPW_10800/index.html