[PATCH i-g-t v14 5/5] tests/intel/gem_exec_gttfill: simplify multiGPU subtest
Janusz Krzysztofik
janusz.krzysztofik at linux.intel.com
Wed Mar 20 19:50:36 UTC 2024
Hi Kamil,
On Wednesday, 20 March 2024 16:56:59 CET Kamil Konieczny wrote:
> Simplify multi-GPU subtest with the help of new multigpu library.
>
> v10: remove igt_require_multigpu() as it checks filters but we
> want to use legacy opens (Kamil), correct Cc name (Zbigniew)
> v14: add missing igt_require_gem() in multigpu-basic (Janusz)
>
> Cc: "Zbigniew Kempczyński" <zbigniew.kempczynski at intel.com>
> Cc: "Dominik Karol Piątkowski" <dominik.karol.piatkowski at intel.com>
> Cc: Janusz Krzysztofik <janusz.krzysztofik at linux.intel.com>
> Signed-off-by: Kamil Konieczny <kamil.konieczny at linux.intel.com>
> ---
> tests/intel/gem_exec_gttfill.c | 14 ++++----------
> 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/tests/intel/gem_exec_gttfill.c b/tests/intel/gem_exec_gttfill.c
> index b1063437b..d79a6ffd5 100644
> --- a/tests/intel/gem_exec_gttfill.c
> +++ b/tests/intel/gem_exec_gttfill.c
> @@ -24,8 +24,8 @@
> #include "i915/gem.h"
> #include "i915/gem_create.h"
> #include "igt.h"
> -#include "igt_device_scan.h"
> #include "igt_rand.h"
> +#include "igt_multigpu.h"
NIT: Don't we want to follow alphabetic ordering of headers?
> /**
> * TEST: gem exec gttfill
> * Description: Fill the GTT with batches.
> @@ -251,7 +251,7 @@ igt_main
> {
> const struct intel_execution_engine2 *e;
> const intel_ctx_t *ctx;
> - int i915 = -1, gpu_count;
> + int i915 = -1;
>
> igt_fixture {
> i915 = drm_open_driver(DRIVER_INTEL);
> @@ -285,17 +285,12 @@ igt_main
> igt_fixture {
> igt_stop_hang_detector();
> intel_ctx_destroy(i915, ctx);
> - // prepare multigpu tests
> - gpu_count = igt_device_filter_count();
> }
>
> igt_subtest("multigpu-basic") { /* run on two or more discrete cards */
> - igt_require(gpu_count > 1);
> - igt_multi_fork(child, gpu_count) {
> - int g_fd;
> + igt_multi_fork_foreach_gpu(g_fd, gpu_idx, DRIVER_INTEL) {
> // prepare
> - g_fd = __drm_open_driver_another(child, DRIVER_INTEL);
> - igt_assert(g_fd >= 0);
> + igt_require_gem(g_fd);
NIT: Not needed -- as you stated, it is already called, for any subtest, from
initial igt_fixture section.
Anyway,
Reviewed-by: Janusz Krzysztofik <janusz.krzysztofik at linux.intel.com>
> ctx = intel_ctx_create_all_physical(g_fd);
> igt_fork_hang_detector(g_fd);
> // subtest
> @@ -303,7 +298,6 @@ igt_main
> // release resources
> igt_stop_hang_detector();
> intel_ctx_destroy(g_fd, ctx);
> - drm_close_driver(g_fd);
> }
>
> igt_waitchildren();
>
More information about the igt-dev
mailing list