[PATCH i-g-t v4 15/25] tests/intel: Introduce Power management subcategory
Kamil Konieczny
kamil.konieczny at linux.intel.com
Thu Mar 21 14:52:10 UTC 2024
Hi Katarzyna,
On 2024-03-14 at 14:34:45 +0000, Katarzyna Piecielska wrote:
> Let's put e.g. pm_rps, pm_rpm, sseu, hwmon, suspend, freg multipliers
> and others under Power management subcategory.
>
> v2: Make Sub-category/Functionality/Feature unique values. (Kamil)
>
> Signed-off-by: Katarzyna Piecielska <katarzyna.piecielska at intel.com>
> Cc: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mauro.chehab at linux.intel.com>
> Cc: Kamil Konieczny <kamil.konieczny at linux.intel.com>
> Cc: Ashutosh Dixit <ashutosh.dixit at intel.com>
> ---
> tests/intel/gem_pxp.c | 3 ++-
> tests/intel/i915_pm_freq_mult.c | 9 ++++++---
> tests/intel/i915_pm_rc6_residency.c | 1 +
> tests/intel/i915_pm_rpm.c | 2 ++
> tests/intel/i915_pm_rps.c | 3 +++
> tests/intel/i915_pm_sseu.c | 3 +++
> tests/intel/i915_power.c | 3 +++
> tests/intel/i915_suspend.c | 3 +++
> 8 files changed, 23 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/tests/intel/gem_pxp.c b/tests/intel/gem_pxp.c
> index 6a7f8e487..bef6056ba 100644
> --- a/tests/intel/gem_pxp.c
> +++ b/tests/intel/gem_pxp.c
> @@ -10,9 +10,10 @@
> /**
> * TEST: gem pxp
> * Description: Test PXP that manages protected content through arbitrated HW-PXP-session
> - * Feature: PXP
> + * Feature: Protected Xe Path
------------------------ ^^
Is this correct? As I see this is as a hardware capability, not
driver. Maybe: cross-device? or device-to-device
> * Functionality: pxp
> * Sub-category: Power management
> + * Category: Desktop client
> * Run type: FULL
> *
> * SUBTEST: create-protected-buffer
> diff --git a/tests/intel/i915_pm_freq_mult.c b/tests/intel/i915_pm_freq_mult.c
> index 49f6722b1..de65eaedf 100644
> --- a/tests/intel/i915_pm_freq_mult.c
> +++ b/tests/intel/i915_pm_freq_mult.c
> @@ -12,9 +12,12 @@
> #include "igt_sysfs.h"
> /**
> * TEST: i915 pm freq mult
> - * Description:
> - * Tests for sysfs controls (or multipliers) for IP blocks which run at frequencies different
> - * from the main GT frequency.
> + * Description: Tests for sysfs controls (or multipliers) for IP blocks which
> + * run at frequencies different from the main GT frequency.
> + * Category: Firmware
There are Sub-category conflicts with 'Firmware':
tests/intel/i915_pm_freq_mult.c: * Category: Firmware
tests/intel/xe_huc_copy.c: * Category: Firmware building block
tests/intel/gem_huc_copy.c: * Sub-category: Firmware
tests/intel/i915_selftest.c: * Sub-category: Firmware
> + * Functionality: freg multipliers
------------------------^
This is here lowercase 'G', should be 'q' - lowercase 'Q', so
s/freg/freq/
> + * Test category: i915
-------------------- ^^^^
imho drop this line.
> + * Sub-category: Power management
> * Run type: FULL
> *
> * SUBTEST: media-freq
> diff --git a/tests/intel/i915_pm_rc6_residency.c b/tests/intel/i915_pm_rc6_residency.c
> index 30f57858d..67ae1f1f9 100644
> --- a/tests/intel/i915_pm_rc6_residency.c
> +++ b/tests/intel/i915_pm_rc6_residency.c
> @@ -46,6 +46,7 @@
> * Feature: GuCRC, pm_rc6
> * Functionality: rc6
> * Sub-category: Power management
> + * Category: Desktop client
> * Run type: FULL
> *
> * SUBTEST: media-rc6-accuracy
> diff --git a/tests/intel/i915_pm_rpm.c b/tests/intel/i915_pm_rpm.c
> index 9fbfac744..be8d5fd77 100644
> --- a/tests/intel/i915_pm_rpm.c
> +++ b/tests/intel/i915_pm_rpm.c
> @@ -44,6 +44,8 @@
> * TEST: i915 pm rpm
> * Feature: pm_rpm
> * Functionality: D3 state entry-exit
> + * Sub-category: Power management
> + * Category: Desktop client
> * Test category: pm_rpm
> * Run type: FULL
> *
> diff --git a/tests/intel/i915_pm_rps.c b/tests/intel/i915_pm_rps.c
> index 820edd45e..3225ca25b 100644
> --- a/tests/intel/i915_pm_rps.c
> +++ b/tests/intel/i915_pm_rps.c
> @@ -49,6 +49,9 @@
> * Description: Render P-States tests - verify GPU frequency changes
> * Feature: pm_rps
> * Test category: pm_rps
> + * Functionality: rps
> + * Sub-category: Power management
> + * Category: Desktop client
> * Run type: FULL
> *
> * SUBTEST: basic-api
> diff --git a/tests/intel/i915_pm_sseu.c b/tests/intel/i915_pm_sseu.c
> index cee29a7c5..354403ef2 100644
> --- a/tests/intel/i915_pm_sseu.c
> +++ b/tests/intel/i915_pm_sseu.c
> @@ -39,6 +39,9 @@
> * TEST: i915 pm sseu
> * Description: Tests slice/subslice/EU power gating functionality.
> * Feature: pm_sseu
> + * Sub-category: Power management
> + * Category: Desktop client
> + * Functionality: sseu
> * Run type: FULL
> *
> * SUBTEST: full-enable
> diff --git a/tests/intel/i915_power.c b/tests/intel/i915_power.c
> index ee00cbcd8..0f083b375 100644
> --- a/tests/intel/i915_power.c
> +++ b/tests/intel/i915_power.c
> @@ -13,6 +13,9 @@
> * Feature: hwmon
> * Run type: FULL
> * Test category: GEM_Legacy
> + * Sub-category: Power management
> + * Category: Desktop client
> + * Functionality: hwmon
> *
> * SUBTEST: sanity
> * Description: Sanity check gpu power measurement
> diff --git a/tests/intel/i915_suspend.c b/tests/intel/i915_suspend.c
> index 4ee815031..7c96e25f5 100644
> --- a/tests/intel/i915_suspend.c
> +++ b/tests/intel/i915_suspend.c
> @@ -49,6 +49,9 @@
> * Feature: suspend
> * Functionality: s2idle w/o i915
> * Test category: suspend
-------------------- ^^^^^^^
Do we need 'Test category'? If yes, maybe something other to
write in this field? It can potentialy collide.
Regards,
Kamil
> + * Functionality: suspend
> + * Sub-category: Power management
> + * Category: Desktop client
> * Run type: FULL
> *
> * SUBTEST: basic-s2idle-without-i915
> --
> 2.34.1
>
More information about the igt-dev
mailing list