[PATCH i-g-t 10/12] tests/intel: Move xe_waitfence test to Synchronization sub-category

[Kamil Konieczny]

Hi Katarzyna,
On 2024-03-22 at 12:41:06 +0000, Katarzyna Piecielska wrote:
> Let's move xe_waitfence test to Synchronization sub-category to align
> with i915 test documentation.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Katarzyna Piecielska <katarzyna.piecielska at intel.com>
> Cc: Kamil Konieczny <kamil.konieczny at linux.intel.com>
> Cc: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mauro.chehab at linux.intel.com>
> Cc: Aditya Chauhan <aditya.chauhan at intel.com>
> Cc: Girotra Himanshu <himanshu.girotra at intel.com>
> ---
>  tests/intel/xe_waitfence.c | 3 +--
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/tests/intel/xe_waitfence.c b/tests/intel/xe_waitfence.c
> index 5a67148ed..071e67bd6 100644
> --- a/tests/intel/xe_waitfence.c
> +++ b/tests/intel/xe_waitfence.c
> @@ -16,7 +16,7 @@
>  /**
>   * TEST: Check if waitfences work
>   * Category: Software building block
> - * Sub-category: waitfence
> + * Sub-category: Synchronizatio

There are conflicts with Functionality fields here:

n.Functionality:../tests/intel/gem_fenced_exec_thrash.c: * Functionality: synchronization
n.Functionality:../tests/intel/gem_fence_thrash.c: * Functionality: synchronization
n.Functionality:../tests/intel/gem_fence_upload.c: * Functionality: synchronization
n.Functionality:../tests/intel/kms_fence_pin_leak.c: * Functionality: kms_core, synchronization

but maybe this should be solved in separate patch.

Acked-by: Kamil Konieczny <kamil.konieczny at linux.intel.com>

>   * Functionality: waitfence
>   * Test category: functionality test
>   * Description: Test waitfences functionality
> @@ -140,7 +140,6 @@ waitfence(int fd, enum waittype wt)
>  /**
>   * TEST: Negative test for wait ufence ioctl
>   * Category: Software building block
> - * Sub-category: waitfence
>   * Functionality: waitfence
>   * Test category: negative test
>   *
> -- 
> 2.34.1
>