Re: ✗ Fi.CI.IGT: failure for Fix memory access issue due to variable block scope (rev2)
Peter Senna Tschudin
me at petersenna.com
Tue Mar 26 07:18:16 UTC 2024
[...]
> IGT changes Possible regressions
>
> -
>
> igt at gem_exec_capture@many-4k-zero:
> - shard-rkl: NOTRUN -> TIMEOUT
> <https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/IGTPW_10907/shard-rkl-5/igt@gem_exec_capture@many-4k-zero.html>
> -
>
> igt at kms_cursor_legacy@flip-vs-cursor-atomic:
> - shard-dg2: PASS
> <https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_14481/shard-dg2-3/igt@kms_cursor_legacy@flip-vs-cursor-atomic.html>
> -> INCOMPLETE
> <https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/IGTPW_10907/shard-dg2-6/igt@kms_cursor_legacy@flip-vs-cursor-atomic.html>
> -
>
> igt at kms_flip@plain-flip-fb-recreate at a-hdmi-a1:
> - shard-rkl: PASS
> <https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_14481/shard-rkl-5/igt@kms_flip@plain-flip-fb-recreate@a-hdmi-a1.html>
> -> FAIL
> <https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/IGTPW_10907/shard-rkl-5/igt@kms_flip@plain-flip-fb-recreate@a-hdmi-a1.html>
> +1 other test fail
>
> Warnings
>
> -
>
> igt at gem_exec_capture@many-4k-incremental:
> - shard-mtlp: FAIL
> <https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_14481/shard-mtlp-6/igt@gem_exec_capture@many-4k-incremental.html>
> (i915#9606 <https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/issues/9606>)
> -> ABORT
> <https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/IGTPW_10907/shard-mtlp-4/igt@gem_exec_capture@many-4k-incremental.html>
> +1 other test abort
> - shard-dg2: FAIL
> <https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_14481/shard-dg2-7/igt@gem_exec_capture@many-4k-incremental.html>
> (i915#9606 <https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/issues/9606>)
> -> ABORT
> <https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/IGTPW_10907/shard-dg2-11/igt@gem_exec_capture@many-4k-incremental.html>
> - shard-rkl: FAIL
> <https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_14481/shard-rkl-3/igt@gem_exec_capture@many-4k-incremental.html>
> (i915#9606 <https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/issues/9606>)
> -> ABORT
> <https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/IGTPW_10907/shard-rkl-4/igt@gem_exec_capture@many-4k-incremental.html>
>
> The timeout seems to be set to a little short of 2 minutes. It takes
almost 4 minutes to complete when running on my "Intel(R) Celeron(R) CPU
N3150 @ 1.60GHz". Interestingly, after the SUCCESS message the user space
process doesn't do much but the "kworker/1:1H+events_highpri" keeps one CPU
busy.
peter at n3150:~/dev/igt-gpu-tools$ time sudo ./build/tests/gem_exec_capture
--run-subtest many-4K-incremental
IGT-Version: 1.28-g80e9084fd (x86_64) (Linux: 6.7.9-200.fc39.x86_64 x86_64)
Using IGT_SRANDOM=1711436449 for randomisation
Opened device: /dev/dri/card1
Starting subtest: many-4K-incremental
Target died after 19.969394s
Captured 0 1-blobs out of a total of 262144
Subtest many-4K-incremental: SUCCESS (48.920s)
real 3m49.723s
user 0m0.028s
sys 0m0.048s
>
> -
> -
>
> igt at gem_exec_capture@many-4k-zero:
> - shard-dg1: FAIL
> <https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_14481/shard-dg1-17/igt@gem_exec_capture@many-4k-zero.html>
> (i915#9606 <https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/issues/9606>)
> -> ABORT
> <https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/IGTPW_10907/shard-dg1-17/igt@gem_exec_capture@many-4k-zero.html>
> +1 other test abort
> - shard-tglu: FAIL
> <https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_14481/shard-tglu-2/igt@gem_exec_capture@many-4k-zero.html>
> (i915#9606 <https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/issues/9606>)
> -> ABORT
> <https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/IGTPW_10907/shard-tglu-9/igt@gem_exec_capture@many-4k-zero.html>
> +1 other test abort
> - shard-glk: FAIL
> <https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_14481/shard-glk8/igt@gem_exec_capture@many-4k-zero.html>
> (i915#9606 <https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/issues/9606>)
> -> ABORT
> <https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/IGTPW_10907/shard-glk9/igt@gem_exec_capture@many-4k-zero.html>
>
> This one is faster, but still takes almost a minute.
$ time sudo ./build/tests/gem_exec_capture --run-subtest many-4K-zero
IGT-Version: 1.28-g80e9084fd (x86_64) (Linux: 6.7.9-200.fc39.x86_64 x86_64)
Using IGT_SRANDOM=1711437134 for randomisation
Opened device: /dev/dri/card1
Starting subtest: many-4K-zero
Target died after 19.966935s
Captured 0 1-blobs out of a total of 262144
Subtest many-4K-zero: SUCCESS (39.697s)
real 0m55.207s
user 0m0.018s
sys 0m0.031s
>
> -
>
> Known issues
>
> Here are the changes found in IGTPW_10907_full that come from known issues:
>
Did my patch break all that?
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/igt-dev/attachments/20240326/f429757f/attachment.htm>
More information about the igt-dev
mailing list