[PATCH i-g-t v3 07/11] lib/intel_cmds_info: Define tiling macros
Juha-Pekka Heikkila
juhapekka.heikkila at gmail.com
Tue May 7 14:27:42 UTC 2024
Hi Zbigniew,
On 7.5.2024 10.58, Zbigniew Kempczyński wrote:
> Blitter tilings don't always matches supported render tilings so
> it is necessary to add separate fields for this purpose. To avoid
> multiple lines where supported tiling is glued with BIT(tiling)
> it is worth to predefine them, especially they will be used in next
> patch related to supported render copy tilings.
>
> Signed-off-by: Zbigniew Kempczyński <zbigniew.kempczynski at intel.com>
>
> ---
> v3: Predefine single tiling first, then complex (Karolina)
> ---
> lib/intel_cmds_info.c | 110 +++++++++++++++++-------------------------
> 1 file changed, 45 insertions(+), 65 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/lib/intel_cmds_info.c b/lib/intel_cmds_info.c
> index 669d3e5006..e7aabf6bfb 100644
> --- a/lib/intel_cmds_info.c
> +++ b/lib/intel_cmds_info.c
> @@ -20,75 +20,59 @@
> .flags = _flags, \
> }
>
> -static const struct blt_cmd_info src_copy = BLT_INFO(SRC_COPY, BIT(T_LINEAR));
> -static const struct blt_cmd_info
> - pre_gen6_xy_src_copy = BLT_INFO(XY_SRC_COPY,
> - BIT(T_LINEAR) |
> - BIT(T_XMAJOR));
> -static const struct blt_cmd_info
> - gen6_xy_src_copy = BLT_INFO(XY_SRC_COPY,
> - BIT(T_LINEAR) |
> - BIT(T_XMAJOR) |
> - BIT(T_YMAJOR));
> -static const struct blt_cmd_info
> - gen11_xy_fast_copy = BLT_INFO(XY_FAST_COPY,
> - BIT(T_LINEAR) |
> - BIT(T_YMAJOR) |
> - BIT(T_YFMAJOR) |
> - BIT(T_TILE64));
> -static const struct blt_cmd_info
> - gen12_xy_fast_copy = BLT_INFO(XY_FAST_COPY,
> - BIT(T_LINEAR) |
> - BIT(T_YMAJOR) |
> - BIT(T_TILE4) |
> - BIT(T_TILE64));
> -static const struct blt_cmd_info
> - dg2_xy_fast_copy = BLT_INFO(XY_FAST_COPY,
> - BIT(T_LINEAR) |
> - BIT(T_XMAJOR) |
> - BIT(T_TILE4) |
> - BIT(T_TILE64));
> -static const struct blt_cmd_info
> - pvc_xy_fast_copy = BLT_INFO(XY_FAST_COPY,
> - BIT(T_LINEAR) |
> - BIT(T_TILE4) |
> - BIT(T_TILE64));
> -
> -static const struct blt_cmd_info
> - gen12_xy_block_copy = BLT_INFO(XY_BLOCK_COPY,
> - BIT(T_LINEAR) |
> - BIT(T_YMAJOR));
> -static const struct blt_cmd_info
> - dg2_xy_block_copy = BLT_INFO_EXT(XY_BLOCK_COPY,
> - BIT(T_LINEAR) |
> - BIT(T_XMAJOR) |
> - BIT(T_TILE4) |
> - BIT(T_TILE64),
> +#define TILE_4 BIT(T_TILE4)
> +#define TILE_64 BIT(T_TILE64)
> +#define TILE_L BIT(T_LINEAR)
> +#define TILE_X BIT(T_XMAJOR)
> +#define TILE_Y BIT(T_YMAJOR)
> +#define TILE_Yf BIT(T_YFMAJOR)
> +
> +#define TILE_L_4_64 (TILE_L | TILE_4 | TILE_64)
> +#define TILE_L_X (TILE_L | TILE_X)
> +#define TILE_L_X_Y (TILE_L | TILE_X | TILE_Y)
> +#define TILE_L_X_4_64 (TILE_L | TILE_X | TILE_4 | TILE_64)
> +#define TILE_L_Y (TILE_L | TILE_Y)
> +#define TILE_L_Y_4_64 (TILE_L | TILE_Y | TILE_4 | TILE_64)
I was wondering if this is intentional or a bug? I see this was already
so in previous implementation so I guess it work.. but on above line is
set bits for linear, y, 4 and 64tile. I think those y and 4 will never
exist in same device? Should here 4 be x instead?
I see this is used for gen12_xy_fast_copy, could this play part in those
failures I had with blitter on adlp w/ x-tile?
> +#define TILE_L_Y_Yf_64 (TILE_L | TILE_Y | TILE_Yf | TILE_64)
> +
> +static const struct blt_cmd_info src_copy = BLT_INFO(SRC_COPY, TILE_L);
> +static const struct blt_cmd_info
> + pre_gen6_xy_src_copy = BLT_INFO(XY_SRC_COPY, TILE_L_X);
> +
> +static const struct blt_cmd_info
> + gen6_xy_src_copy = BLT_INFO(XY_SRC_COPY, TILE_L_X_Y);
> +
> +static const struct blt_cmd_info
> + gen11_xy_fast_copy = BLT_INFO(XY_FAST_COPY, TILE_L_Y_Yf_64);
> +
> +static const struct blt_cmd_info
> + gen12_xy_fast_copy = BLT_INFO(XY_FAST_COPY, TILE_L_Y_4_64);
> +
> +static const struct blt_cmd_info
> + dg2_xy_fast_copy = BLT_INFO(XY_FAST_COPY, TILE_L_X_4_64);
> +
> +static const struct blt_cmd_info
> + pvc_xy_fast_copy = BLT_INFO(XY_FAST_COPY, TILE_L_4_64);
> +
> +static const struct blt_cmd_info
> + gen12_xy_block_copy = BLT_INFO(XY_BLOCK_COPY, TILE_L_Y);
> +
> +static const struct blt_cmd_info
> + dg2_xy_block_copy = BLT_INFO_EXT(XY_BLOCK_COPY, TILE_L_X_4_64,
> BLT_CMD_EXTENDED |
> BLT_CMD_SUPPORTS_COMPRESSION);
>
> static const struct blt_cmd_info
> - xe2_xy_block_copy = BLT_INFO_EXT(XY_BLOCK_COPY,
> - BIT(T_LINEAR) |
> - BIT(T_XMAJOR) |
> - BIT(T_TILE4) |
> - BIT(T_TILE64),
> + xe2_xy_block_copy = BLT_INFO_EXT(XY_BLOCK_COPY, TILE_L_X_4_64,
> BLT_CMD_EXTENDED |
> BLT_CMD_SUPPORTS_COMPRESSION);
>
> static const struct blt_cmd_info
> - mtl_xy_block_copy = BLT_INFO_EXT(XY_BLOCK_COPY,
> - BIT(T_LINEAR) |
> - BIT(T_XMAJOR) |
> - BIT(T_TILE4) |
> - BIT(T_TILE64),
> + mtl_xy_block_copy = BLT_INFO_EXT(XY_BLOCK_COPY, TILE_L_X_4_64,
> BLT_CMD_EXTENDED);
>
> static const struct blt_cmd_info
> - pvc_xy_block_copy = BLT_INFO_EXT(XY_BLOCK_COPY,
> - BIT(T_LINEAR) |
> - BIT(T_TILE4) |
> - BIT(T_TILE64),
> + pvc_xy_block_copy = BLT_INFO_EXT(XY_BLOCK_COPY, TILE_L_4_64,
> BLT_CMD_EXTENDED);
>
> static const struct blt_cmd_info
> @@ -102,17 +86,13 @@ static const struct blt_cmd_info
> BIT(M_MATRIX));
>
> static const struct blt_cmd_info
> - pre_gen6_xy_color_blt = BLT_INFO(XY_COLOR_BLT,
> - BIT(T_LINEAR) |
> - BIT(T_XMAJOR));
> + pre_gen6_xy_color_blt = BLT_INFO(XY_COLOR_BLT, TILE_L_X);
>
> static const struct blt_cmd_info
> - gen6_xy_color_blt = BLT_INFO_EXT(XY_COLOR_BLT,
> - BIT(T_LINEAR) |
> - BIT(T_YMAJOR) |
> - BIT(T_XMAJOR),
> + gen6_xy_color_blt = BLT_INFO_EXT(XY_COLOR_BLT, TILE_L_X_Y,
> BLT_CMD_EXTENDED);
>
> +
> const struct intel_cmds_info pre_gen6_cmds_info = {
> .blt_cmds = {
> [SRC_COPY] = &src_copy,
More information about the igt-dev
mailing list