[PATCH v3 1/2] tests/kms_vrr: Add a subtest for seamless modeset to a virtual LRR mode
Modem, Bhanuprakash
bhanuprakash.modem at intel.com
Tue May 21 05:22:43 UTC 2024
On 21-05-2024 10:16 am, Manasi Navare wrote:
> Hi Bhanu,
>
> Yes I have verified that, it looks good and I have also been running
> this on my Chromebook with VRR panel and it works fine.
> Could you please review and help get this landed?
Thanks for the confirmation, this patch is already merged by JP.
https://cgit.freedesktop.org/drm/igt-gpu-tools/commit/?id=927fecf906d25e88f19bc245982c022465276528
- Bhanu
>
> Manasi
>
> On Mon, May 20, 2024 at 12:54 AM Modem, Bhanuprakash
> <bhanuprakash.modem at intel.com> wrote:
>>
>> Hi Manasi,
>>
>> Sorry for replying late, I was in vacation.
>>
>> On 27-04-2024 12:54 am, Manasi Navare wrote:
>>> Hi Bhanu, Jani,
>>>
>>> I do see that even the other vrr tests : seamless-rr-switch-vrr /drrs/
>>> basic-fastset are getting skipped on BAT, so its not related to this
>>> test. I am able to run it here locally and test.
>>> Could you please take a look and see why all of these would be
>>> skipped? Seems unrelated to this change.
>>
>> In case of seamless-rr-switch-(vrr|drrs), these skips are expected, as
>> we don't have any valid config. These tests are eDP specific & panel
>> should have the modes with different refresh rates & clocks with same
>> resolution.
>>
>> In case of seamless-rr-switch-virtual, it is a connector agnostic test,
>> it should run on one of the BAT machines.
>>
>> Can you please review the helper low_rr_mode_with_same_res() once, as
>> you are using this one to pick the low RR mode?
>>
>>>
>>> Regards
>>> Manasi
>>>
>>> On Fri, Apr 26, 2024 at 12:48 AM Saarinen, Jani <jani.saarinen at intel.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Hi,
>>>>> -----Original Message-----
>>>>> From: igt-dev <igt-dev-bounces at lists.freedesktop.org> On Behalf Of Modem,
>>>>> Bhanuprakash
>>>>> Sent: Friday, 26 April 2024 6.44
>>>>> To: Manasi Navare <navaremanasi at chromium.org>
>>>>> Cc: igt-dev at lists.freedesktop.org; Drew Davenport
>>>>> <ddavenport at chromium.org>; Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala at linux.intel.com>;
>>>>> Sean Paul <seanpaul at chromium.org>
>>>>> Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 1/2] tests/kms_vrr: Add a subtest for seamless
>>>>> modeset to a virtual LRR mode
>>>>>
>>>>> Hi Manasi,
>>>>>
>>>>> On 25-04-2024 08:50 pm, Manasi Navare wrote:
>>>>>> Hi Bhanu,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Thanks for the review.
>>>>>> This is not specific to edp, it applies to all connectors.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> If the BAT results look okay and I have your r-b, could we get this merged?
>>>> Did you look those.
>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Looks, BAT results are not OK to me.
>>>> Right. To me looks so too.
>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> The newly added test is getting skip on VRR configs:
>>>>> https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/IGTPW_11065/bat-
>>>>> all.html?testfilter=kms_vrr&hosts=bat-adlp-6%7Cbat-adlp-9%7Cbat-rpls-
>>>>> 4%7Cbat-adls-6
>>>>>
>>>>> - Bhanu
>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Regards
>>>>>> Manasi
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Thu, Apr 25, 2024 at 12:39 AM Modem, Bhanuprakash
>>>>>> <bhanuprakash.modem at intel.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Hi Manasi,
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On 25-04-2024 01:43 am, Manasi Navare wrote:
>>>>>>>> This subtest validates LRR fastset functionality by testing seamless
>>>>>>>> switching without full modeset to any of the virtual LRR mode within VRR
>>>>> range.
>>>>>>>> Here we start from highest refresh rate mode and then switch to
>>>>>>>> virtual LRR modes in the steps of 10Hz within the VRR range.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> This is used to test the LRR fastset functionality of the driver.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> v5:
>>>>>>>> - Pass a reference to flip_and_measure (bhanu)
>>>>>>>> - Add a new line between between declaration and code logic
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> v4:
>>>>>>>> - Change the test name to align with drrs/vrr tests (Bhanu)
>>>>>>>> - Fix some build warnings due to rebase
>>>>>>>> - Use a local virtual_mode variable
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> v3:
>>>>>>>> - Fix build error due to rebase (Manasi)
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Cc: Drew Davenport <ddavenport at chromium.org>
>>>>>>>> Cc: Bhanuprakash Modem <bhanuprakash.modem at intel.com>
>>>>>>>> Cc: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala at linux.intel.com>
>>>>>>>> Cc: Sean Paul <seanpaul at chromium.org>
>>>>>>>> Signed-off-by: Manasi Navare <navaremanasi at chromium.org>
>>>>>>>> ---
>>>>>>>> tests/kms_vrr.c | 73
>>>>> ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---
>>>>>>>> 1 file changed, 69 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> diff --git a/tests/kms_vrr.c b/tests/kms_vrr.c index
>>>>>>>> 15c62b34b..7f64d6806 100644
>>>>>>>> --- a/tests/kms_vrr.c
>>>>>>>> +++ b/tests/kms_vrr.c
>>>>>>>> @@ -66,6 +66,11 @@
>>>>>>>> * Description: Test to switch RR seamlessly without modeset.
>>>>>>>> * Functionality: adaptive_sync, drrs
>>>>>>>> *
>>>>>>>> + * SUBTEST: seamless-rr-switch-virtual
>>>>>>>> + * Description: Test to create a Virtual Mode in VRR range and switch to
>>>>> it
>>>>>>>> + * without a full modeset.
>>>>>>>> + * Functionality: LRR
>>>>>>>> + *
>>>>>>>> * SUBTEST: max-min
>>>>>>>> * Description: Oscillates between highest and lowest refresh each
>>>>> frame for
>>>>>>>> * manual flicker profiling
>>>>>>>> @@ -89,9 +94,10 @@ enum {
>>>>>>>> TEST_FLIPLINE = 1 << 3,
>>>>>>>> TEST_SEAMLESS_VRR = 1 << 4,
>>>>>>>> TEST_SEAMLESS_DRRS = 1 << 5,
>>>>>>>> - TEST_FASTSET = 1 << 6,
>>>>>>>> - TEST_MAXMIN = 1 << 7,
>>>>>>>> - TEST_NEGATIVE = 1 << 8,
>>>>>>>> + TEST_SEAMLESS_VIRTUAL_RR = 1 << 6,
>>>>>>>> + TEST_FASTSET = 1 << 7,
>>>>>>>> + TEST_MAXMIN = 1 << 8,
>>>>>>>> + TEST_NEGATIVE = 1 << 9,
>>>>>>>> };
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> enum {
>>>>>>>> @@ -214,6 +220,18 @@ low_rr_mode_with_same_res(igt_output_t
>>>>> *output, unsigned int vrr_min)
>>>>>>>> return mode;
>>>>>>>> }
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> +static drmModeModeInfo
>>>>>>>> +virtual_rr_vrr_range_mode(igt_output_t *output, unsigned int
>>>>>>>> +virtual_refresh_rate) {
>>>>>>>> + drmModeModeInfo mode = *igt_output_get_mode(output);
>>>>>>>> + uint64_t clock_hz = mode.clock * 1000;
>>>>>>>> +
>>>>>>>> + mode.vtotal = clock_hz / (mode.htotal * virtual_refresh_rate);
>>>>>>>> + mode.vrefresh = virtual_refresh_rate;
>>>>>>>> +
>>>>>>>> + return mode;
>>>>>>>> +}
>>>>>>>> +
>>>>>>>> /* Read min and max vrr range from the connector debugfs. */
>>>>>>>> static range_t
>>>>>>>> get_vrr_range(data_t *data, igt_output_t *output) @@ -641,6
>>>>>>>> +659,49 @@ test_seamless_rr_basic(data_t *data, enum pipe pipe,
>>>>> igt_output_t *output, uint3
>>>>>>>> vrr ? "on" : "off", vrr ? "not reached" : "exceeded", result);
>>>>>>>> }
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> +static void
>>>>>>>> +test_seamless_virtual_rr_basic(data_t *data, enum pipe pipe,
>>>>>>>> +igt_output_t *output, uint32_t flags) {
>>>>>>>> + uint32_t result;
>>>>>>>> + unsigned int vrefresh;
>>>>>>>> + uint64_t rate[] = {0};
>>>>>>>> +
>>>>>>>> + igt_info("Use HIGH_RR Mode as default\n");
>>>>>>>> + kmstest_dump_mode(&data->switch_modes[HIGH_RR_MODE]);
>>>>>>>> +
>>>>>>>> + prepare_test(data, output, pipe);
>>>>>>>> + rate[0] =
>>>>>>>> + rate_from_refresh(data->switch_modes[HIGH_RR_MODE].vrefresh);
>>>>>>>> +
>>>>>>>> + /*
>>>>>>>> + * Sink with DRR and VRR can be in downclock mode so
>>>>>>>> + * switch to highest refresh rate mode.
>>>>>>>> + */
>>>>>>>> + igt_output_override_mode(output, &data-
>>>>>> switch_modes[HIGH_RR_MODE]);
>>>>>>>> + igt_assert(igt_display_try_commit_atomic(&data->display,
>>>>>>>> + DRM_MODE_PAGE_FLIP_EVENT, NULL) == 0);
>>>>>>>> +
>>>>>>>> + result = flip_and_measure(data, output, pipe, rate, 1,
>>>>> TEST_DURATION_NS);
>>>>>>>> + igt_assert_f(result > 75,
>>>>>>>> + "Refresh rate (%u Hz) %"PRIu64"ns: Target threshold not
>>>>> reached, result was %u%%\n",
>>>>>>>> + data->switch_modes[HIGH_RR_MODE].vrefresh,
>>>>>>>> + rate[0], result);
>>>>>>>> +
>>>>>>>> + /* Switch to Virtual RR */
>>>>>>>> + for (vrefresh = data->range.min + 10; vrefresh < data->range.max;
>>>>> vrefresh += 10) {
>>>>>>>> + drmModeModeInfo virtual_mode =
>>>>>>>> + virtual_rr_vrr_range_mode(output, vrefresh);
>>>>>>>> +
>>>>>>>> + igt_info("Requesting Virtual Mode with Refresh Rate (%u Hz): \n",
>>>>> vrefresh);
>>>>>>>> + kmstest_dump_mode(&virtual_mode);
>>>>>>>> +
>>>>>>>> + igt_output_override_mode(output, &virtual_mode);
>>>>>>>> +
>>>>>>>> + igt_assert(igt_display_try_commit_atomic(&data->display, 0, NULL)
>>>>>>>> + == 0);
>>>>>>>> +
>>>>>>>> + rate[0] = rate_from_refresh(vrefresh);
>>>>>>>> + result = flip_and_measure(data, output, pipe, rate, 1,
>>>>> TEST_DURATION_NS);
>>>>>>>> + igt_assert_f(result > 75,
>>>>>>>> + "Refresh rate (%u Hz) %"PRIu64"ns: Target threshold not
>>>>> reached, result was %u%%\n",
>>>>>>>> + vrefresh, rate[0], result);
>>>>>>>> + }
>>>>>>>> +}
>>>>>>>> +
>>>>>>>> static void test_cleanup(data_t *data, enum pipe pipe, igt_output_t
>>>>> *output)
>>>>>>>> {
>>>>>>>> if (vrr_capable(output))
>>>>>>>> @@ -686,7 +747,7 @@ static bool output_constraint(data_t *data,
>>>>> igt_output_t *output, uint32_t flags
>>>>>>>> igt_output_override_mode(output,
>>>>>>>> &data->switch_modes[HIGH_RR_MODE]);
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> /* Search for a low refresh rate mode. */
>>>>>>>> - if (!(flags & (TEST_SEAMLESS_VRR | TEST_SEAMLESS_DRRS)))
>>>>>>>> + if (!(flags & (TEST_SEAMLESS_VRR | TEST_SEAMLESS_DRRS |
>>>>>>>> + TEST_SEAMLESS_VIRTUAL_RR)))
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Does this virtual RR applicable to eDP only or supports other
>>>>>>> connector types too? If it is eDP specific [*], then we must add a check for
>>>>> that.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> [*]:
>>>>>>> https://cgit.freedesktop.org/drm/igt-gpu-tools/tree/tests/kms_vrr.c#n
>>>>>>> 660
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> With above comment addressed, this patch is
>>>>>>> Reviewed-by: Bhanuprakash Modem <bhanuprakash.modem at intel.com>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> - Bhanu
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> return true;
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> data->switch_modes[LOW_RR_MODE] =
>>>>>>>> low_rr_mode_with_same_res(output, data->range.min); @@ -841,6
>>>>> +902,10 @@ igt_main_args("drs:", long_opts, help_str, opt_handler, &data)
>>>>>>>> "between flip timestamps converges to the requested
>>>>> rate");
>>>>>>>> igt_subtest_with_dynamic("flip-basic-fastset")
>>>>>>>> run_vrr_test(&data, test_basic,
>>>>>>>> TEST_FASTSET);
>>>>>>>> +
>>>>>>>> + igt_describe("Test to switch to any custom virtual mode in VRR
>>>>> range without modeset.");
>>>>>>>> + igt_subtest_with_dynamic("seamless-rr-switch-virtual")
>>>>>>>> + run_vrr_test(&data,
>>>>>>>> + test_seamless_virtual_rr_basic, TEST_SEAMLESS_VIRTUAL_RR);
>>>>>>>> }
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> igt_fixture {
More information about the igt-dev
mailing list