[PATCH i-g-t 1/1] tests/intel-ci: Block all gem_exec_fair tests

[Kamil Konieczny]

Hi Katarzyna,
On 2024-11-15 at 08:59:47 +0000, Katarzyna Piecielska wrote:
> As i915 schedules is not going to be improved there is no need to
> execute gem_exec_fair tests. For now let's keep them for future
> reference.
> 
> Ref:
> https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/issues/2842
> https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/i915/kernel/-/issues/12786
> 
> Signed-off-by: Katarzyna Piecielska <katarzyna.piecielska at intel.com>
> Cc: Andi Shyti <andi.shyti at linux.intel.com>
> Cc: Krzysztof Niemiec <krzysztof.niemiec at intel.com>
> ---
>  tests/intel-ci/blacklist.txt | 2 +-
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/tests/intel-ci/blacklist.txt b/tests/intel-ci/blacklist.txt
> index cfc5491d5..6d1a4111f 100644
> --- a/tests/intel-ci/blacklist.txt
> +++ b/tests/intel-ci/blacklist.txt
> @@ -29,7 +29,7 @@ igt at gem_evict_alignment(@.*)?
>  igt at gem_evict_everything(@.*)?
>  igt at gem_exec_big@(?!.*single).*
>  igt at gem_exec_capture@many-.*
> -igt at gem_exec_fair@(?!.*basic).*
> +igt at gem_exec_fair@(@.*)?

There are two '@' chars: @(@
imho this should be like in _latency below:

igt at gem_exec_fair(@.*)?

Regards,
Kamil

>  igt at gem_exec_fence@.*hang.*
>  igt at gem_exec_flush@(?!.*basic).*
>  igt at gem_exec_latency(@.*)?
> -- 
> 2.34.1
>