[PATCH i-g-t] lib/xe/oa: Re-instate TestOa metric sets in LNL/BMG XML's

[Souza, Jose]

On Mon, 2024-11-18 at 09:28 -0800, Dixit, Ashutosh wrote:
> On Mon, 18 Nov 2024 09:20:00 -0800, Souza, Jose wrote:
> > 
> > > diff --git a/lib/xe/oa-configs/codegen.py b/lib/xe/oa-configs/codegen.py
> > > index 51498f803d..7251f5c7a6 100644
> > > --- a/lib/xe/oa-configs/codegen.py
> > > +++ b/lib/xe/oa-configs/codegen.py
> > > @@ -352,6 +352,9 @@ class Gen:
> > >          m = re.search(r'\$GtSlice([0-9]+)XeCore([0-9]+)$', name)
> > >          if m:
> > >              return 'intel_xe_perf_devinfo_subslice_available(&perf->devinfo, {0}, {1})'.format(m.group(1), m.group(2))
> > > +        m = re.search(r'\$GtXeCore([0-99]+)$', name)
> > > +        if m:
> > > +            return 'intel_xe_perf_devinfo_subslice_available(&perf->devinfo, {0}, 0)'.format(m.group(1))
> > 
> > Just note sure about this one, it have 8 GtXeCore so should be the
> > subslice/DSS not the slices.  But you would also need need to ajust the
> > first parameter to take into consideration subslices in the second and
> > other slices or add a function that does this for you.
> 
> Yup, I just put it in "something" there to make this compile for now. I
> want to add a FIXME here to fix later.
> 
> It can be fixed later if anyone is going to use it. We don't know how to
> use this information yet, at least in IGT, so I am assuming this can be
> fixed if needed, if it's going to be used, at the time we try to actually
> make use of the TestOa metric in IGT.
> 
> Is there any use for this in Mesa?

Not used by Mesa, so you can add my RB with a TODO comment here.

Reviewed-by: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza at intel.com>

> 
> Thanks.
> --
> Ashutosh