[PATCH i-g-t] tests/intel/xe_wedged: Manage verbosity of GT reset fault injection

[Rodrigo Vivi]

On Tue, Nov 26, 2024 at 03:02:40PM -0800, Matt Roper wrote:
> igt at xe_wedged@basic-wedged triggers a GT reset and uses fault injection
> to ensure that the reset artificially fails.  This works as expected,
> but depending on the value in the fail_gt_reset/verbose debugfs
> when the test starts, different levels of output may be printed to
> dmesg.  The test already marks the general "declared wedged" message as
> expected so that igt_runner won't try to flag those as test errors, but
> if verbose=2, then the fault injection framework will also issue print
> dump_stack() output which gets flagged as a problem by igt_runner.
> 
> Explicitly set verbose=1 when running the test so that we get the
> general wedged message and fault injection notification (which we
> already tell igt_runner to ignore), but skip the unnecessary stack dump
> that just confuses the runner.
> 

Cc: Kamil Konieczny <kamil.konieczny at linux.intel.com>
Cc: Francois Dugast <francois.dugast at intel.com>

> Closes: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/xe/kernel/-/issues/2919
> Signed-off-by: Matt Roper <matthew.d.roper at intel.com>
> ---
>  tests/intel/xe_wedged.c | 1 +
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
> 
> diff --git a/tests/intel/xe_wedged.c b/tests/intel/xe_wedged.c
> index 88e5d47f2..0db8c8eba 100644
> --- a/tests/intel/xe_wedged.c
> +++ b/tests/intel/xe_wedged.c
> @@ -213,6 +213,7 @@ igt_main
>  	igt_subtest("basic-wedged") {
>  		igt_require(igt_debugfs_exists(fd, "fail_gt_reset/probability",
>  					       O_RDWR));
> +		igt_debugfs_write(fd, "fail_gt_reset/verbose", "1");

Great finding! I believe this solves some of the cases that Kamil was working to mask.
But also +Francois because it might have some use on the other fault-inject cases.

Thanks a lot,
Rodrigo.

>  
>  		igt_assert_eq(simple_ioctl(fd), 0);
>  		ignore_wedged_in_dmesg();
> -- 
> 2.47.0
>