[PATCH i-g-t, v4] tests/intel/xe_pm: Add tests for suspend without display

[Sundaresan, Sujaritha]

On 8/28/2024 2:16 PM, Sundaresan, Sujaritha wrote:
>
> On 8/27/2024 6:24 PM, Gupta, Anshuman wrote:
>>
>>> -----Original Message-----
>>> From: Sousa, Gustavo <gustavo.sousa at intel.com>
>>> Sent: Tuesday, August 27, 2024 6:18 PM
>>> To: De Marchi, Lucas <lucas.demarchi at intel.com>; Gupta, Anshuman
>>> <anshuman.gupta at intel.com>; Sundaresan, Sujaritha
>>> <sujaritha.sundaresan at intel.com>
>>> Cc: Kamil Konieczny <kamil.konieczny at linux.intel.com>; igt-dev@
>>> <lists.freedesktop.org igt-dev at lists.freedesktop.org>; Piecielska, 
>>> Katarzyna
>>> <katarzyna.piecielska at intel.com>
>>> Subject: RE: [PATCH i-g-t, v4] tests/intel/xe_pm: Add tests for 
>>> suspend without
>>> display
>>>
>>> Quoting Gupta, Anshuman (2024-08-27 06:29:06-03:00)
>>>
>>>> For s0ix DC9 is the pre-requisite rather then DC6, DC9 does not have
>>>> any depende ncy on DMC.
>>> Maybe DC6 and DC9 are pre-requisites for different S0ix sub-states?
>>>
>>> - BSpec 68851 says that DC6 is requirement for S0ix.
>>> - BSpec 68857 says that DC9 supports S0ix with more power savings than
>>>    DC6.
>> DC6 is pre-requisite for runtime s0ix with PSR Display On use cases. 
>> Which is irrelevant for system wide suspend.
>> Thanks,
>> Anshuman.
>>> -- 
>>> Gustavo Sousa
>
> Hi all,
>
> Thanks for the comments. So if I have it right the only final change 
> here is to switch the param to disable_display right ?
>
> Thanks,
>
> Suja
>
Hi all,

Gentle ping on the above question.

Thanks,

Suja