[PATCH i-g-t 3/6] tests/kms_ccs: Use logical && instead of bitwise &

[Ville Syrjälä]

On Mon, Sep 23, 2024 at 04:01:21PM -0500, Lucas De Marchi wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 23, 2024 at 11:45:54PM GMT, Ville Syrjälä wrote:
> >From: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala at linux.intel.com>
> >
> >The code appears to want to use a logical AND instead
> >of a bitwise AND. Make it so.
> >
> >Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala at linux.intel.com>
> >---
> > tests/intel/kms_ccs.c | 4 ++--
> > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> >
> >diff --git a/tests/intel/kms_ccs.c b/tests/intel/kms_ccs.c
> >index 835a3fe5aed2..8be8ac58e576 100644
> >--- a/tests/intel/kms_ccs.c
> >+++ b/tests/intel/kms_ccs.c
> >@@ -394,8 +394,8 @@ static void access_flat_ccs_surface(struct igt_fb *fb, bool verify_compression)
> > 	uint16_t cpu_caching = DRM_XE_GEM_CPU_CACHING_WC;
> > 	uint8_t uc_mocs = intel_get_uc_mocs_index(fb->fd);
> > 	uint8_t comp_pat_index = intel_get_pat_idx_wt(fb->fd);
> >-	uint32_t region = (AT_LEAST_GEN(intel_get_drm_devid(fb->fd), 20) &
> >-						xe_has_vram(fb->fd)) ? REGION_LMEM(0) : REGION_SMEM;
> >+	uint32_t region = (AT_LEAST_GEN(intel_get_drm_devid(fb->fd), 20) &&
> >+			   xe_has_vram(fb->fd)) ? REGION_LMEM(0) : REGION_SMEM;
> 
> nit: first parenthesis is also pointless and it'd read better without
> breaking the line in the middle of the condition.

This code should probably be refactored more heavily anyway
since we seem to be repeating ourselves many times.

> 
> Anyway,
> 
> 
> Reviewed-by: Lucas De Marchi <lucas.demarchi at intel.com>
> 
> Lucas De Marchi
> 
> >
> > 	struct drm_xe_engine_class_instance inst = {
> > 		.engine_class = DRM_XE_ENGINE_CLASS_COPY,
> >-- 
> >2.44.2
> >

-- 
Ville Syrjälä
Intel