[PATCH i-g-t] tests/intel/xe_exec_reset: Skip syncobj_wait during the gt_reset

[Bommu Krishnaiah]

From: "Bommu Krishnaiah" <krishnaiah.bommu at intel.com>

Skipping the syncobj_wait for the workloads which is submitted
before gt reset, since After gt reset There is no expectation
from the hardware/GuC/KMD that the workload will then
re-execute and complete.

Signed-off-by: Bommu Krishnaiah <krishnaiah.bommu at intel.com>
Cc: Stuart Summers <stuart.summers at intel.com>
---
 tests/intel/xe_exec_reset.c | 8 +++++---
 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/tests/intel/xe_exec_reset.c b/tests/intel/xe_exec_reset.c
index b5d5f43ea..b1a7548c6 100644
--- a/tests/intel/xe_exec_reset.c
+++ b/tests/intel/xe_exec_reset.c
@@ -263,8 +263,9 @@ test_balancer(int fd, int gt, int class, int n_exec_queues, int n_execs,
 	}
 
 	for (i = 0; i < n_exec_queues && n_execs; i++)
-		igt_assert(syncobj_wait(fd, &syncobjs[i], 1, INT64_MAX, 0,
-					NULL));
+		if (!(flags & GT_RESET))
+			igt_assert(syncobj_wait(fd, &syncobjs[i], 1, INT64_MAX,
+						0, NULL));
 	igt_assert(syncobj_wait(fd, &sync[0].handle, 1, INT64_MAX, 0, NULL));
 
 	sync[0].flags |= DRM_XE_SYNC_FLAG_SIGNAL;
@@ -410,7 +411,8 @@ test_legacy_mode(int fd, struct drm_xe_engine_class_instance *eci,
 	}
 
 	for (i = 0; i < n_exec_queues && n_execs; i++)
-		igt_assert(syncobj_wait(fd, &syncobjs[i], 1, INT64_MAX, 0,
+		if (!(flags & GT_RESET))
+			igt_assert(syncobj_wait(fd, &syncobjs[i], 1, INT64_MAX, 0,
 					NULL));
 	igt_assert(syncobj_wait(fd, &sync[0].handle, 1, INT64_MAX, 0, NULL));
 
-- 
2.34.1