[PATCH i-g-t v2 2/2] CONTRIBUTING: Add guide about igt libraries
Kamil Konieczny
kamil.konieczny at linux.intel.com
Tue Apr 1 14:22:43 UTC 2025
Hi Dixit,,
On 2025-03-31 at 10:08:54 -0700, Dixit, Ashutosh wrote:
> On Mon, 31 Mar 2025 06:34:24 -0700, Kamil Konieczny wrote:
> >
> > Add some general guide about adding new library function and
> > a few guides for their usage outside of tests.
> >
> > Cc: Andrzej Hajda <andrzej.hajda at intel.com>
> > Cc: Zbigniew Kempczyński <zbigniew.kempczynski at intel.com>
> > Signed-off-by: Kamil Konieczny <kamil.konieczny at linux.intel.com>
> > Acked-by: Katarzyna Piecielska <katarzyna.piecielska at intel.com>
> > ---
> > CONTRIBUTING.md | 28 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> > 1 file changed, 28 insertions(+)
> >
> > diff --git a/CONTRIBUTING.md b/CONTRIBUTING.md
> > index 8370451d6..d4efa61f5 100644
> > --- a/CONTRIBUTING.md
> > +++ b/CONTRIBUTING.md
> > @@ -38,6 +38,34 @@ The Code
> >
> > [igt-describe]: https://drm.pages.freedesktop.org/igt-gpu-tools/igt-gpu-tools-Core.html#igt-describe
> >
> > +IGT libraries
> > +-------------
> > +- Tests and benchmarks are the main usage of IGT libraries, so they
> > + could use test specific macros/functions, for example igt_assert,
> > + igt_require, igt_skip, igt_info or igt_debug.
> > +
> > +- New library function could be written when it will have at least two
> > + different users, for example if it could be used by two or more tests.
> > + In some cases single user can be accepted, when it is very likely it
> > + will be used in future.
> > +
> > +- In a new library function():
> > + if it uses some of the macros igt_assert/igt_require/igt_skip then
> > + consider to write also __function() with the same functionality but
> > + without them.
> > +
> > +- Libraries and igt_runner
> > + Runner should not use lib functions. It is crucial for CI runs so using
> > + libraries puts a risk of bringing changes meant for tests which in turn
> > + could break runner.
> > + Note: You will find places where igt_runner uses lib functions - this will
> > + be on ToDo list to be fixed.
> > +
> > +- Libraries and tools/
> > + Tools should try to not use lib functions. Any abnormal condition should
> > + be simply reported by printf or fprintf to stdout/stderr and then tool
> > + should exit gracefully. Do not use igt_abort nor igt_assert, igt_print,
> > + igt_debug nor other testing/printing macros from igt lib/
>
> Not sure about runner, but for tools, I'd rather have shared functions from
> lib/ rather than duplicating code. So we should be more specific here about
> which functions tools should not use. Maybe tools should not use 'igt_abort
> nor igt_assert, igt_print, igt_debug' etc. or even using these might be ok,
> as long as the tool works as expected?
>
> Or maybe just say here that 'give some thought if you are planning to use
> IGT lib code in tools, some IGT lib functions might be be appropriate in
> tools'.
>
> For example previously a lot of extra code was written in i915 perf
> library, just to avoid using IGT lib/. I changed this approach in xe perf
> lib and decided to use IGT lib/.
>
You are right, I will rewrite this.
Regards,
Kamil
>
>
> >
> > Sending Patches
> > ---------------
> > --
> > 2.49.0
> >
More information about the igt-dev
mailing list