RE: ✗ i915.CI.Full: failure for tests/intel/intel_sysfs_debugfs: Remove xe-gt

[Ravali, JupallyX]

Hi,

https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/series/147513/ - Re-reported.
i915.CI.FULL - Re-reported.

Thanks,
Ravali.

-----Original Message-----
From: I915-ci-infra <i915-ci-infra-bounces at lists.freedesktop.org> On Behalf Of Peter Senna Tschudin
Sent: 10 April 2025 22:52
To: igt-dev at lists.freedesktop.org; I915-ci-infra at lists.freedesktop.org
Subject: Re: ✗ i915.CI.Full: failure for tests/intel/intel_sysfs_debugfs: Remove xe-gt

Dear I915,

On 4/10/2025 7:09 PM, Patchwork wrote:
> == Series Details ==
> 
> Series: tests/intel/intel_sysfs_debugfs: Remove xe-gt
> URL   : https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/series/147513/
> State : failure
> 
> == Summary ==
> 
> CI Bug Log - changes from CI_DRM_16395_full -> IGTPW_12955_full 
> ====================================================
> 
> Summary
> -------
> 
>   **FAILURE**
> 
>   Serious unknown changes coming with IGTPW_12955_full absolutely need to be
>   verified manually.
>   
>   If you think the reported changes have nothing to do with the changes
>   introduced in IGTPW_12955_full, please notify your bug team (I915-ci-infra at lists.freedesktop.org) to allow them
>   to document this new failure mode, which will reduce false positives in CI.
> 
>   External URL: 
> https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/IGTPW_12955/index.html
> 
> Participating hosts (10 -> 10)
> ------------------------------
> 
>   No changes in participating hosts
> 
> Possible new issues
> -------------------
> 
>   Here are the unknown changes that may have been introduced in IGTPW_12955_full:
> 
> ### IGT changes ###
> 
> #### Possible regressions ####
> 
>   * igt at kms_async_flips@overlay-atomic:
>     - shard-rkl:          NOTRUN -> [SKIP][1]
>    [1]: 
> https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/IGTPW_12955/shard-rkl-1/igt@k
> ms_async_flips at overlay-atomic.html
> 

This is unrelated to my change. Please fix and re-run.

[...]