[PATCH i-g-t v1 1/2] tests/kms_async_flips: Split subtest to handle linear buffers separately
Karthik B S
karthik.b.s at intel.com
Wed Apr 16 12:43:59 UTC 2025
Hi Santhosh,
On 4/15/2025 9:21 PM, Santhosh Reddy Guddati wrote:
> As linear buffers are considered corner cases, split the existing subtests
> run_with_modifiers to handle as a separate subtest.
>
> Signed-off-by: Santhosh Reddy Guddati <santhosh.reddy.guddati at intel.com>
> ---
> tests/kms_async_flips.c | 41 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--
> 1 file changed, 39 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/tests/kms_async_flips.c b/tests/kms_async_flips.c
> index 031417ed8..df3e136b7 100644
> --- a/tests/kms_async_flips.c
> +++ b/tests/kms_async_flips.c
> @@ -88,6 +88,14 @@
> *
> * SUBTEST: overlay-atomic
> * Description: Verify overlay planes with async flips in atomic API
> + *
> + * SUBTEST: async-flip-with-page-flip-events-linear
> + * Description: Verify the async flip functionality and the fps during async flips
> + * with linear modifier
> + *
> + * SUBTEST: async-flip-with-page-flip-events-atomic-linear
> + * Description: Verify the async flip functionality and the fps during async flips
> + * with linear modifier in Atomic API
> */
Please rename the existing test to '-tiled'.
>
> #define CURSOR_POS 128
> @@ -128,6 +136,7 @@ typedef struct {
> struct buf_ops *bops;
> bool atomic_path;
> bool overlay_path;
> + bool linear_modifier;
> } data_t;
>
> static void flip_handler(int fd_, unsigned int sequence, unsigned int tv_sec,
> @@ -266,6 +275,7 @@ static void test_init_ops(data_t *data)
> data->alternate_sync_async = false;
> data->atomic_path = false;
> data->overlay_path = false;
> + data->linear_modifier = false;
> }
>
> static void test_init_fbs(data_t *data)
> @@ -792,15 +802,23 @@ static void run_test_with_modifiers(data_t *data, void (*test)(data_t *))
> test_init(data);
>
> for (int i = 0; i < data->plane->format_mod_count; i++) {
> + uint64_t modifier = data->plane->modifiers[i];
> +
> if (data->plane->formats[i] != DRM_FORMAT_XRGB8888)
> continue;
>
> + if (data->linear_modifier && modifier != DRM_FORMAT_MOD_LINEAR)
> + continue;
> +
> + if (!data->linear_modifier && modifier == DRM_FORMAT_MOD_LINEAR)
> + continue;
> +
> data->allow_fail = true;
> - data->modifier = data->plane->modifiers[i];
> + data->modifier = modifier;
>
> igt_dynamic_f("pipe-%s-%s-%s", kmstest_pipe_name(data->pipe),
> data->output->name,
> - igt_fb_modifier_name(data->modifier)) {
> + igt_fb_modifier_name(modifier)) {
> /*
> * FIXME: joiner+async flip is busted currently in KMD.
> * Remove this check once the issues are fixed in KMD.
> @@ -863,6 +881,25 @@ igt_main
> run_test(&data, test_async_flip);
> }
>
> + igt_describe("Wait for page flip events in between successive asynchronous "
> + "flips with linear modifiers");
> + igt_subtest_with_dynamic("async-flip-with-page-flip-events-linear") {
> + test_init_ops(&data);
> + data.linear_modifier = true;
> + igt_require(is_intel_device(data.drm_fd));
> + run_test_with_modifiers(&data, test_async_flip);
> + }
> +
> + igt_describe("Wait for page flip events in between successive asynchronous "
> + "flips using atomic path with linear modifiers");
> + igt_subtest_with_dynamic("async-flip-with-page-flip-events-atomic-linear") {
> + test_init_ops(&data);
> + data.atomic_path = true;
> + data.linear_modifier = true;
> + igt_require(is_intel_device(data.drm_fd));
This would always skip on non-intel platforms? Is that the intention as
linear should be supported on all?
I think can reverse this and we can make tiled subtest intel specific as
even now we call run_test which eventually will have linear modifier itself?
Regards,
Karthik.B.S
> + run_test_with_modifiers(&data, test_async_flip);
> + }
> +
> igt_describe("Alternate between sync and async flips");
> igt_subtest_with_dynamic("alternate-sync-async-flip") {
> test_init_ops(&data);
More information about the igt-dev
mailing list