[PATCH i-g-t v2 1/2] tests/kms_async_flips: Split subtest to handle linear buffers separately
Karthik B S
karthik.b.s at intel.com
Mon Apr 21 09:14:36 UTC 2025
Hi Santhosh,
On 4/16/2025 8:33 PM, Santhosh Reddy Guddati wrote:
> As linear buffers are considered corner cases, split the existing subtests
> run_with_modifiers to handle as a separate subtest.
>
> V2:
> Rename existing subtest to tiled modifier and make the tiled subtest
> intel specific, fix linear modifier subtest to avoid skip on non intel
> platforms (Karthik).
>
> Signed-off-by: Santhosh Reddy Guddati <santhosh.reddy.guddati at intel.com>
> ---
> tests/kms_async_flips.c | 53 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-------
> 1 file changed, 45 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/tests/kms_async_flips.c b/tests/kms_async_flips.c
> index 031417ed8..a3defe604 100644
> --- a/tests/kms_async_flips.c
> +++ b/tests/kms_async_flips.c
> @@ -45,7 +45,7 @@
> * Description: Verify the async flip functionality and the fps during async flips
> * Alternate between sync and async flips
> *
> - * SUBTEST: async-flip-with-page-flip-events
> + * SUBTEST: async-flip-with-page-flip-events-tiled
> * Description: Verify the async flip functionality and the fps during async flips
> * Wait for page flip events in between successive asynchronous flips
> *
> @@ -66,7 +66,7 @@
> * SUBTEST: alternate-sync-async-flip-atomic
> * Description: Verify the async flip functionality and the fps during async flips using atomic path
> *
> - * SUBTEST: async-flip-with-page-flip-events-atomic
> + * SUBTEST: async-flip-with-page-flip-events-tiled-atomic
> * Description: Wait for page flip events in between successive asynchronous flips using atomic path
> *
> * SUBTEST: test-time-stamp-atomic
> @@ -88,6 +88,14 @@
> *
> * SUBTEST: overlay-atomic
> * Description: Verify overlay planes with async flips in atomic API
> + *
> + * SUBTEST: async-flip-with-page-flip-events-linear
> + * Description: Verify the async flip functionality and the fps during async flips
> + * with linear modifier
> + *
> + * SUBTEST: async-flip-with-page-flip-events-linear-atomic
> + * Description: Verify the async flip functionality and the fps during async flips
> + * with linear modifier in Atomic API
> */
>
> #define CURSOR_POS 128
> @@ -128,6 +136,7 @@ typedef struct {
> struct buf_ops *bops;
> bool atomic_path;
> bool overlay_path;
> + bool linear_modifier;
> } data_t;
>
> static void flip_handler(int fd_, unsigned int sequence, unsigned int tv_sec,
> @@ -266,6 +275,7 @@ static void test_init_ops(data_t *data)
> data->alternate_sync_async = false;
> data->atomic_path = false;
> data->overlay_path = false;
> + data->linear_modifier = false;
> }
>
> static void test_init_fbs(data_t *data)
> @@ -792,15 +802,23 @@ static void run_test_with_modifiers(data_t *data, void (*test)(data_t *))
> test_init(data);
>
> for (int i = 0; i < data->plane->format_mod_count; i++) {
> + uint64_t modifier = data->plane->modifiers[i];
> +
> if (data->plane->formats[i] != DRM_FORMAT_XRGB8888)
> continue;
>
> + if (data->linear_modifier && modifier != DRM_FORMAT_MOD_LINEAR)
> + continue;
> +
> + if (!data->linear_modifier && modifier == DRM_FORMAT_MOD_LINEAR)
> + continue;
> +
> data->allow_fail = true;
> - data->modifier = data->plane->modifiers[i];
> + data->modifier = modifier;
>
> igt_dynamic_f("pipe-%s-%s-%s", kmstest_pipe_name(data->pipe),
> data->output->name,
> - igt_fb_modifier_name(data->modifier)) {
> + igt_fb_modifier_name(modifier)) {
> /*
> * FIXME: joiner+async flip is busted currently in KMD.
> * Remove this check once the issues are fixed in KMD.
> @@ -844,19 +862,38 @@ igt_main
> require_monotonic_timestamp(data.drm_fd);
>
> igt_describe("Wait for page flip events in between successive asynchronous flips");
> - igt_subtest_with_dynamic("async-flip-with-page-flip-events") {
> + igt_subtest_with_dynamic("async-flip-with-page-flip-events-tiled") {
> + test_init_ops(&data);
> + igt_require(is_intel_device(data.drm_fd));
> + run_test_with_modifiers(&data, test_async_flip);
> + }
> +
> + igt_describe("Wait for page flip events in between successive "
> + "asynchronous flips using atomic path");
> + igt_subtest_with_dynamic("async-flip-with-page-flip-events-tiled-atomic") {
> + test_init_ops(&data);
> + data.atomic_path = true;
> + igt_require(is_intel_device(data.drm_fd));
> + run_test_with_modifiers(&data, test_async_flip);
> + }
> +
> + igt_describe("Wait for page flip events in between successive asynchronous "
> + "flips with linear modifiers");
> + igt_subtest_with_dynamic("async-flip-with-page-flip-events-linear") {
> test_init_ops(&data);
> + data.linear_modifier = true;
> if (is_intel_device(data.drm_fd))
> run_test_with_modifiers(&data, test_async_flip);
> else
> run_test(&data, test_async_flip);
With this current change in test design, we could just use the run_test
function itself for linear. This would eliminate the looping for
non-linear modifiers which we're anyway skipping eventually. Also,
inside run_test_with_modifiers we can reduce the checks as we would then
be using that function exclusively for tiled modifiers only.
In run_test we would just need this one change.
data->modifier = data.linear_modifier? DRM_FORMAT_MOD_LINEAR:
default_modifier(data);
Thanks,
Karthik.B.S
> }
>
> - igt_describe("Wait for page flip events in between successive "
> - "asynchronous flips using atomic path");
> - igt_subtest_with_dynamic("async-flip-with-page-flip-events-atomic") {
> + igt_describe("Wait for page flip events in between successive asynchronous "
> + "flips using atomic path with linear modifiers");
> + igt_subtest_with_dynamic("async-flip-with-page-flip-events-linear-atomic") {
> test_init_ops(&data);
> data.atomic_path = true;
> + data.linear_modifier = true;
> if (is_intel_device(data.drm_fd))
> run_test_with_modifiers(&data, test_async_flip);
> else
More information about the igt-dev
mailing list