[PATCH i-g-t] tests/kms_display_modes: fit modes in mst bw

[Sharma, Swati2]

Hi Kunal,


On 16-01-2025 11:47 am, Kunal Joshi wrote:
> Instead of checking only currrent modes,
> find combination of modes in mst topology
> that can be accomodated in current link bw.
>
> Fixes: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/xe/kernel/-/issues/2633
> Signed-off-by: Kunal Joshi <kunal1.joshi at intel.com>
> ---
>   tests/kms_display_modes.c | 20 +++++++++++++++++---
>   1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/tests/kms_display_modes.c b/tests/kms_display_modes.c
> index e41c60cc0..a582ba1a9 100644
> --- a/tests/kms_display_modes.c
> +++ b/tests/kms_display_modes.c
> @@ -60,6 +60,22 @@ typedef struct {
>   	int n_pipes;
>   } data_t;
>   
> +static bool fit_modes_in_bw(data_t *data)
> +{
> +        bool found;
> +        int ret;
> +
> +        ret = igt_display_try_commit_atomic(&data->display,
> +                                            DRM_MODE_ATOMIC_TEST_ONLY |
> +                                            DRM_MODE_ATOMIC_ALLOW_MODESET, NULL);
> +        if (ret != 0) {
> +                found = igt_override_all_active_output_modes_to_fit_bw(&data->display);
> +                igt_require_f(found,
> +                              "No valid mode combo found for modeset\n");
> +        }
> +        return true;
> +}
> +
>   /* Get higher mode supported by panel. */
>   static drmModeModeInfo *get_highres_mode(igt_output_t *output)
>   {
> @@ -279,7 +295,6 @@ static void run_extendedmode_negative(data_t *data, int pipe1, int pipe2)
>   	struct igt_fb fbs[2];
>   	igt_display_t *display = &data->display;
>   	igt_plane_t *plane[2];
> -	int ret;
>   
>   	igt_display_reset(display);
>   
> @@ -306,8 +321,7 @@ static void run_extendedmode_negative(data_t *data, int pipe1, int pipe2)
>   	igt_output_override_mode(data->mst_output[1], &data->mode_mst[1]);
>   
>   	igt_require(intel_pipe_output_combo_valid(display));
> -	ret = igt_display_try_commit2(display, COMMIT_ATOMIC);
> -	igt_assert(ret != 0 && errno == ENOSPC);
> +	igt_assert_f(fit_modes_in_bw(data), "Unable to fit modes in bw\n");
Don't we have to check 2nd condition? errno == ENOSPC?
>   }
>   
>   igt_main