[PATCH i-g-t] tests/intel-ci: Add kms_sysfs_edid_timing to blocklist

Kamil Konieczny kamil.konieczny at linux.intel.com
Wed Feb 19 10:01:16 UTC 2025


Hi Nautiyal,,
On 2025-02-19 at 13:30:23 +0530, Nautiyal, Ankit K wrote:
> 
> On 2/18/2025 1:02 PM, Sharma, Swati2 wrote:
> > Hi Kamil
> > 
> > On 14-02-2025 04:15 pm, Kamil Konieczny wrote:
> > > Hi Swati,
> > > On 2025-02-13 at 18:58:02 +0530, Swati Sharma wrote:
> > > > Add kms_sysfs_edid_timing to blocklist. Test was written with the
> > > > idea that edid read shouldn't take an unreasonable amount of time.
> > > > The timeout is an arbitrary value because it depends on when the
> > > > display responds and, in some cases, especially when the display
> > > > is coming back from sleep, it can take quite a while. This test
> > > > has sporadic behavior across various platforms connected to
> > > > different displays.
> > > > 
> > > > Signed-off-by: Swati Sharma <swati2.sharma at intel.com>
> > > Acked-by: Kamil Konieczny <kamil.konieczny at linux.intel.com>
> > > 
> > > Could such measurements be moved to tools into some generic one,
> > > like display_wakeup or display_response?
> > Even I had this proposal to move this test into tools.
> > @ankit any feedback?
> 
> Perhaps there would be some value to have a tool to get the measurement.
> 
> I agree on adding the test to the CI blocklist to reduce noise due to this
> test.
> 
> Reviewed-by: Ankit Nautiyal <ankit.k.nautiyal at intel.com>
> 
> 

Thank you, applied.

Regards,
Kamil

[...cut...]


More information about the igt-dev mailing list