[PATCH v2] tests/intel: Enhance the wedged_mode sysfs support
Gurram, Pravalika
pravalika.gurram at intel.com
Mon Jan 13 13:13:46 UTC 2025
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Kamil Konieczny <kamil.konieczny at linux.intel.com>
> Sent: Friday, January 10, 2025 5:03 PM
> To: Gurram, Pravalika <pravalika.gurram at intel.com>
> Cc: igt-dev at lists.freedesktop.org; Cavitt, Jonathan
> <jonathan.cavitt at intel.com>
> Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] tests/intel: Enhance the wedged_mode sysfs support
>
> Hi Pravalika,
> On 2025-01-08 at 11:58:26 +0530, Pravalika Gurram wrote:
> > 1. Added support to read the wedged_mode sysfs 2. Handle the
> > -ETIMEDOUT return value during forcewake_all sysfs open
>
> How is testing forcewake related to wedged? imho this should be separate
> patch, see also below.
>
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Pravalika Gurram <pravalika.gurram at intel.com>
> > Reviewed-by: Jonathan Cavitt <jonathan.cavitt at intel.com>
> > ---
> > tests/intel/xe_debugfs.c | 2 +-
> > tests/intel/xe_wedged.c | 12 ++++++++++++
> > 2 files changed, 13 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/tests/intel/xe_debugfs.c b/tests/intel/xe_debugfs.c index
> > bcbb5036a..3a83868ba 100644
> > --- a/tests/intel/xe_debugfs.c
> > +++ b/tests/intel/xe_debugfs.c
> > @@ -268,7 +268,7 @@ test_forcewake(int fd) {
> > int handle = igt_debugfs_open(fd, "forcewake_all", O_WRONLY);
> >
> > - igt_assert_neq(handle, -1);
> > + igt_assert_lte(0, handle);
>
> Please drop this change, that function return -1 in case of error, if you have a
> report that it is not please send this in separate patch.
>
This changes got pushed by mistake will remove from patch.
> > close(handle);
> > }
> >
> > diff --git a/tests/intel/xe_wedged.c b/tests/intel/xe_wedged.c index
> > 613d571b4..844ab2809 100644
> > --- a/tests/intel/xe_wedged.c
> > +++ b/tests/intel/xe_wedged.c
> > @@ -203,11 +203,16 @@ simple_hang(int fd, struct drm_xe_sync *sync)
> > * SUBTEST: wedged-mode-toggle
> > * Description: Test wedged.mode=1 after testing wedged.mode=2
> > */
> > +/**
> > + * SUBTEST: basic-wedged-read
> > + * Description: Read wedged debugfs
> > + */
> > igt_main
> > {
> > struct drm_xe_engine_class_instance *hwe;
> > int fd;
> > char pci_slot[NAME_MAX];
> > + char str[150];
> >
> > igt_fixture {
> > fd = drm_open_driver(DRIVER_XE);
> > @@ -279,6 +284,13 @@ igt_main
> > igt_assert_eq(simple_ioctl(fd), 0);
> > }
> >
> > + igt_subtest_f("basic-wedged-read") {
> > + igt_require(igt_debugfs_exists(fd, "wedged_mode",
> O_RDONLY));
> > +
> > + igt_debugfs_read(fd, "wedged_mode", str);
> > + igt_assert_f(str[0] != '\0', "Failed to read wedged_mode from
> > +debugfs!\n");
>
> Is this correct? Why not using
> ret = igt_debugfs_read(fd, "wedged_mode", str); and assert on
> ret <= 0
>
> Regards,
> Kamil
>
Since igt_debugfs_read is wraper for __igt_debugfs_read.
#define igt_debugfs_read(fd, filename, buf) \
__igt_debugfs_read(fd, (filename), (buf), sizeof(buf))
>
> > + }
> > +
> > igt_fixture {
> > if (igt_debugfs_exists(fd, "fail_gt_reset/probability", O_RDWR))
> {
> > igt_debugfs_write(fd, "fail_gt_reset/probability", "0");
> > --
> > 2.34.1
> >
More information about the igt-dev
mailing list