RE: ✗ i915.CI.Full: failure for lib/igt_kmemleak: library to interact with kmemleak (rev2)

[Ravali, JupallyX]

Hi,
 
https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/series/142673/ -  Re-reported.
 
Xe.CI.Full - Addressed failures, Xe cannot be re-reported.
i915.CI.Full - Re-reported.
 
Thanks,
Ravali

-----Original Message-----
From: I915-ci-infra <i915-ci-infra-bounces at lists.freedesktop.org> On Behalf Of Peter Senna Tschudin
Sent: 14 January 2025 13:46
To: igt-dev at lists.freedesktop.org; I915-ci-infra at lists.freedesktop.org
Subject: Re: ✗ i915.CI.Full: failure for lib/igt_kmemleak: library to interact with kmemleak (rev2)

Dear I915,



On 13.01.2025 13:54, Patchwork wrote:
> == Series Details ==
> 
> Series: lib/igt_kmemleak: library to interact with kmemleak (rev2)
> URL   : https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/series/142673/
> State : failure
> 
> == Summary ==
> 
> CI Bug Log - changes from CI_DRM_15934_full -> IGTPW_12421_full 
> ====================================================
> 
> Summary
> -------
> 
>   **FAILURE**
> 
>   Serious unknown changes coming with IGTPW_12421_full absolutely need to be
>   verified manually.
>   
>   If you think the reported changes have nothing to do with the changes
>   introduced in IGTPW_12421_full, please notify your bug team (I915-ci-infra at lists.freedesktop.org) to allow them
>   to document this new failure mode, which will reduce false positives in CI.
> 
>   External URL: 
> https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/IGTPW_12421/index.html
> 
> Participating hosts (12 -> 11)
> ------------------------------
> 
>   Missing    (1): shard-glk-0 
> 
> Possible new issues
> -------------------
> 
>   Here are the unknown changes that may have been introduced in IGTPW_12421_full:
> 
> ### IGT changes ###
> 
> #### Possible regressions ####
> 
>   * igt at gem_exec_suspend@basic-s3-devices at smem:
>     - shard-mtlp:         [PASS][1] -> [ABORT][2] +1 other test abort
>    [1]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_15934/shard-mtlp-5/igt@gem_exec_suspend@basic-s3-devices@smem.html
>    [2]: 
> https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/IGTPW_12421/shard-mtlp-4/igt@
> gem_exec_suspend at basic-s3-devices@smem.html
> 
>   * igt at gem_exec_whisper@basic-contexts-priority:
>     - shard-mtlp:         [PASS][3] -> [INCOMPLETE][4]
>    [3]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_15934/shard-mtlp-1/igt@gem_exec_whisper@basic-contexts-priority.html
>    [4]: 
> https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/IGTPW_12421/shard-mtlp-6/igt@
> gem_exec_whisper at basic-contexts-priority.html
> 
>   * igt at kms_ccs@crc-primary-suspend-y-tiled-ccs at pipe-a-hdmi-a-1:
>     - shard-glk:          NOTRUN -> [INCOMPLETE][5]
>    [5]: 
> https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/IGTPW_12421/shard-glk1/igt@km
> s_ccs at crc-primary-suspend-y-tiled-ccs@pipe-a-hdmi-a-1.html
> 
>   
> #### Warnings ####
> 
>   * igt at gem_exec_big@single:
>     - shard-tglu:         [ABORT][6] ([i915#11713]) -> [ABORT][7]
>    [6]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_15934/shard-tglu-10/igt@gem_exec_big@single.html
>    [7]: 
> https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/IGTPW_12421/shard-tglu-10/igt
> @gem_exec_big at single.html

These possible regressions and warnings are unrelated to my change. Please fix and re-run.

Thank you!

[...]