[PATCH i-g-t] tests/intel/xe_exec_mix_modes: Use IGT comparison functions

[Kamil Konieczny]

Hi Francois,
On 2025-01-27 at 11:14:25 +0100, Francois Dugast wrote:
> With igt_assert() the logs were only telling us that the comparison had
> failed. With igt_assert_lt() the logs provide the actual values that
> were compared, which helps debugging.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Francois Dugast <francois.dugast at intel.com>

Reviewed-by: Kamil Konieczny <kamil.konieczny at linux.intel.com>

> ---
>  tests/intel/xe_exec_mix_modes.c | 4 ++--
>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/tests/intel/xe_exec_mix_modes.c b/tests/intel/xe_exec_mix_modes.c
> index 0bcd49cc0..59887d2aa 100644
> --- a/tests/intel/xe_exec_mix_modes.c
> +++ b/tests/intel/xe_exec_mix_modes.c
> @@ -169,10 +169,10 @@ run_job(int fd, struct drm_xe_engine_class_instance *hwe,
>  			 * depending on the execution mode.
>  			 */
>  			if (engine_execution_mode == EXEC_MODE_LR)
> -				igt_assert(igt_nsec_elapsed(&tv) < 0.5 * duration_ns);
> +				igt_assert_lt(igt_nsec_elapsed(&tv), 0.5 * duration_ns);
>  			else if (engine_execution_mode == EXEC_MODE_DMA_FENCE &&
>  				 job_type == SPINNER_INTERRUPTED)
> -				igt_assert(igt_nsec_elapsed(&tv) > duration_ns);
> +				igt_assert_lt(duration_ns, igt_nsec_elapsed(&tv));
>  		}
>  	}
>  
> -- 
> 2.43.0
>