[PATCH i-g-t] tests/intel/xe-oa: Use subslice_mask in pec_sanity_check

[Ashutosh Dixit]

pec_sanity_check previously relied on pec counter values being 0 to ignore
missing xecores's. However we are now running into situations where pec
counters are non-zero even when xecores are missing. To get past this, use
subslice_mask (i.e. mask of present xecore's) to ignore missing xecore's.

Signed-off-by: Ashutosh Dixit <ashutosh.dixit at intel.com>
---
 tests/intel/xe_oa.c | 11 ++++++-----
 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)

diff --git a/tests/intel/xe_oa.c b/tests/intel/xe_oa.c
index 724fea73f0..2de5802876 100644
--- a/tests/intel/xe_oa.c
+++ b/tests/intel/xe_oa.c
@@ -1023,12 +1023,12 @@ static void pec_sanity_check(const u32 *report0, const u32 *report1,
 
 		igt_debug("n %d: pec1[n] - pec0[n] %#" PRIx64 ", tick delta %#" PRIx64 "\n",
 			  n, pec1[n] - pec0[n], tick_delta);
-		/* 0 value for pec[xecore_idx[i]] indicates missing xecore */
-		if (pec1[n] && pec0[n])
+
+		/* Skip missing xecore's */
+		if (intel_xe_perf->devinfo.subslice_mask & BIT(i)) {
+			igt_assert(pec1[n] && pec0[n]);
 			assert_within_epsilon(pec1[n] - pec0[n], tick_delta, 0.1);
-		/* Same test_event1_cycles_xecore* should be present in all reports */
-		if (pec1[n])
-			igt_assert(pec0[n]);
+		}
 	}
 
 	igt_debug("pec1[2] - pec0[2] %#" PRIx64 ", tick_delta * num_xecores: %#" PRIx64 "\n",
@@ -1201,6 +1201,7 @@ init_sys_info(void)
 	igt_debug("n_eu_slices: %"PRIu64"\n", intel_xe_perf->devinfo.n_eu_slices);
 	igt_debug("n_eu_sub_slices: %"PRIu64"\n", intel_xe_perf->devinfo.n_eu_sub_slices);
 	igt_debug("n_eus: %"PRIu64"\n", intel_xe_perf->devinfo.n_eus);
+	igt_debug("subslice_mask: %#"PRIx64"\n", intel_xe_perf->devinfo.subslice_mask);
 	igt_debug("timestamp_frequency = %"PRIu64"\n",
 		  intel_xe_perf->devinfo.timestamp_frequency);
 	igt_assert_neq(intel_xe_perf->devinfo.timestamp_frequency, 0);
-- 
2.48.1