[PATCH i-g-t v1] tests/intel-ci: Blocklist unsupported Xe scaling tests

[Karthik B S]

Hi,

On 6/13/2025 1:47 AM, Naladala Ramanaidu wrote:
> The second scaler does not support downscaling in either
> vertical or horizontal dimensions. Blocklist the affected IGT
> kms_plane_scaling tests that involve downscaling scenarios
> unsupported by the second scaler.
>
> Bspec: 69901
>
> Signed-off-by: Naladala Ramanaidu<ramanaidu.naladala at intel.com>
> ---
>   tests/intel-ci/xe.blocklist.txt | 4 ++++
>   1 file changed, 4 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/tests/intel-ci/xe.blocklist.txt b/tests/intel-ci/xe.blocklist.txt
> index ebe1ff006..8e43c217d 100644
> --- a/tests/intel-ci/xe.blocklist.txt
> +++ b/tests/intel-ci/xe.blocklist.txt
> @@ -82,6 +82,10 @@igt at kms_pm_rpm@cursor.*
>   ##################################################################
>   igt at kms_atomic@plane-primary-overlay-mutable-zpos
>   igt at kms_plane_scaling@.*downscale-factor-0-25.*
> +igt at kms_plane_scaling@planes-downscale-factor-.*5
I see few of the tests passing with this filter where we've upscale on 
the second plane. We need a more specific filter here.
> +igt at kms_plane_scaling@planes-upscale-20x20-downscale-factor-.*
> +igt at kms_plane_scaling@planes-upscale-factor-0-25-downscale-factor-.*
Could the above 2 can be combined into one? 
'igt at kms_plane_scaling@planes-upscale-.*-downscale-factor-.*'
> +igt at kms_plane_scaling@planes-unity-scaling-downscale-factor-.*

This I see is mostly passing other than 0.25 which is blocklisted 
already. Do we need this?

Thanks,
Karthik.B.S
>   igt at kms_prime@.*
>   igt at kms_scaling_modes@scaling-mode-none
>   igt at kms_writeback@writeback.*
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/igt-dev/attachments/20250613/f9b76bcf/attachment.htm>