[PATCH i-g-t v3 3/5] tests/kms_flip: Increase test duration for flip-vs-wf_vblank

[Naladala, Ramanaidu]

Hi Karthik,

On 6/17/2025 9:16 AM, Karthik B S wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On 6/16/2025 12:08 PM, Naladala Ramanaidu wrote:
>> Boost testing and coverage for lower refresh rate panels.
>
> Could we add more justification here? Are we doing this because we're 
> now adding the some buffer/tolerance to the flip pass rate and so we 
> need a larger sample size?
>
> Thanks,
> Karthik.B.S 
I thought it would be correct if there were more samples, but there is 
no need for time change. I will remove this patch.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Naladala Ramanaidu <ramanaidu.naladala at intel.com>
>> ---
>>   tests/kms_flip.c | 2 +-
>>   1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/tests/kms_flip.c b/tests/kms_flip.c
>> index 2328259ba..5873591fa 100755
>> --- a/tests/kms_flip.c
>> +++ b/tests/kms_flip.c
>> @@ -2026,7 +2026,7 @@ igt_main_args("e", NULL, help_str, opt_handler, 
>> NULL)
>>             { 30, TEST_FLIP | TEST_VBLANK | TEST_VBLANK_ABSOLUTE |
>>                 TEST_CHECK_TS, "flip-vs-absolute-wf_vblank" },
>> -        { 2, TEST_FLIP | TEST_VBLANK | TEST_CHECK_TS | TEST_BASIC,
>> +        { 30, TEST_FLIP | TEST_VBLANK | TEST_CHECK_TS | TEST_BASIC,
>>                       "flip-vs-wf_vblank" },
>>           { 30, TEST_FLIP | TEST_VBLANK | TEST_VBLANK_BLOCK |
>>               TEST_CHECK_TS, "flip-vs-blocking-wf-vblank" },