[PATCH i-g-t v2 07/14] tests/intel/xe_oa: Rewrite the polling small buf test
Dixit, Ashutosh
ashutosh.dixit at intel.com
Tue Mar 4 00:05:56 UTC 2025
On Mon, 03 Mar 2025 15:14:55 -0800, Umesh Nerlige Ramappa wrote:
>
> The polling-small-buf test is specifically testing that POLLIN is still
> set after an ENOSPC error. In the buggy code, POLLIN was cleared on
> the ENOSPC error even though there was data to be read. The test was
> putting an upper bound on the number of bytes read in a fixed duration
> of time. While this worked, we had occassional failures that were due to
> scheduling and other dependencies outside the scope of this test.
>
> In an attempt to make the test more robust,
> - use a more definitive method to wait for few reports
> - force an ENOSPC error using a small buffer
> - Ensure POLLIN is still set in the subsequent poll() call
>
> v2:
> - Add "why" in commit message (Ashutosh)
> - Use uapi to wait for N reports
Reviewed-by: Ashutosh Dixit <ashutosh.dixit at intel.com>
>
> Signed-off-by: Umesh Nerlige Ramappa <umesh.nerlige.ramappa at intel.com>
> ---
> tests/intel/xe_oa.c | 53 ++++++++++++++++++++-------------------------
> 1 file changed, 23 insertions(+), 30 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/tests/intel/xe_oa.c b/tests/intel/xe_oa.c
> index 08406ca5c..dd16b39a9 100644
> --- a/tests/intel/xe_oa.c
> +++ b/tests/intel/xe_oa.c
> @@ -2216,7 +2216,6 @@ static void test_polling(uint64_t requested_oa_period,
> */
> static void test_polling_small_buf(void)
> {
> - int oa_exponent = max_oa_exponent_for_period_lte(40 * 1000); /* 40us */
> uint64_t properties[] = {
> DRM_XE_OA_PROPERTY_OA_UNIT_ID, 0,
>
> @@ -2226,50 +2225,44 @@ static void test_polling_small_buf(void)
> /* OA unit configuration */
> DRM_XE_OA_PROPERTY_OA_METRIC_SET, default_test_set->perf_oa_metrics_set,
> DRM_XE_OA_PROPERTY_OA_FORMAT, __ff(default_test_set->perf_oa_format),
> - DRM_XE_OA_PROPERTY_OA_PERIOD_EXPONENT, oa_exponent,
> + DRM_XE_OA_PROPERTY_OA_PERIOD_EXPONENT, oa_exponent_default,
> + DRM_XE_OA_PROPERTY_WAIT_NUM_REPORTS, 5,
> DRM_XE_OA_PROPERTY_OA_DISABLED, true,
> };
> struct intel_xe_oa_open_prop param = {
> .num_properties = ARRAY_SIZE(properties) / 2,
> .properties_ptr = to_user_pointer(properties),
> };
> - uint32_t test_duration = 80 * 1000 * 1000;
> - int sample_size = get_oa_format(default_test_set->perf_oa_format).size;
> - int n_expected_reports = test_duration / oa_exponent_to_ns(oa_exponent);
> - int n_expect_read_bytes = n_expected_reports * sample_size;
> - struct timespec ts = {};
> - int n_bytes_read = 0;
> - uint32_t n_polls = 0;
> + struct pollfd pollfd;
> + uint8_t buf[10];
> + int ret;
>
> stream_fd = __perf_open(drm_fd, ¶m, true /* prevent_pm */);
> set_fd_flags(stream_fd, O_CLOEXEC | O_NONBLOCK);
> - do_ioctl(stream_fd, DRM_XE_OBSERVATION_IOCTL_ENABLE, 0);
>
> - while (igt_nsec_elapsed(&ts) < test_duration) {
> - struct pollfd pollfd = { .fd = stream_fd, .events = POLLIN };
> -
> - ppoll(&pollfd, 1, NULL, NULL);
> - if (pollfd.revents & POLLIN) {
> - uint8_t buf[1024];
> - int ret;
> + /* Kickstart the capture */
> + do_ioctl(stream_fd, DRM_XE_OBSERVATION_IOCTL_ENABLE, 0);
>
> - ret = read(stream_fd, buf, sizeof(buf));
> - if (ret >= 0)
> - n_bytes_read += ret;
> - }
> + /*
> + * Wait for number of reports specified in
> + * DRM_XE_OA_PROPERTY_WAIT_NUM_REPORTS
> + */
> + pollfd.fd = stream_fd;
> + pollfd.events = POLLIN;
> + poll(&pollfd, 1, -1);
> + igt_assert(pollfd.revents & POLLIN);
>
> - n_polls++;
> - }
> + /* Just read one report and expect ENOSPC */
> + errno = 0;
> + ret = read(stream_fd, buf, sizeof(buf));
> + igt_assert_eq(ret, -1);
> + igt_assert_eq(errno, ENOSPC);
>
> - igt_info("Read %d expected %d (%.2f%% of the expected number), polls=%u\n",
> - n_bytes_read, n_expect_read_bytes,
> - n_bytes_read * 100.0f / n_expect_read_bytes,
> - n_polls);
> + /* Poll with 0 timeout and expect POLLIN flag to be set */
> + poll(&pollfd, 1, 0);
> + igt_assert(pollfd.revents & POLLIN);
>
> __perf_close(stream_fd);
> -
> - igt_assert(abs(n_expect_read_bytes - n_bytes_read) <
> - 0.20 * n_expect_read_bytes);
> }
>
> static int
> --
> 2.34.1
>
More information about the igt-dev
mailing list