Re: ✗ i915.CI.Full: failure for Integrate kmemleak scans in igt_runner (rev5)

Peter Senna Tschudin peter.senna at linux.intel.com
Wed Mar 5 07:44:46 UTC 2025


Dear i915,

On 05.03.2025 08:28, Patchwork wrote:
> == Series Details ==
> 
> Series: Integrate kmemleak scans in igt_runner (rev5)
> URL   : https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/series/143996/
> State : failure
> 
> == Summary ==
> 
> CI Bug Log - changes from CI_DRM_16199_full -> IGTPW_12677_full
> ====================================================
> 
> Summary
> -------
> 
>   **FAILURE**
> 
>   Serious unknown changes coming with IGTPW_12677_full absolutely need to be
>   verified manually.
>   
>   If you think the reported changes have nothing to do with the changes
>   introduced in IGTPW_12677_full, please notify your bug team (I915-ci-infra at lists.freedesktop.org) to allow them
>   to document this new failure mode, which will reduce false positives in CI.
> 
>   External URL: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/IGTPW_12677/index.html
> 
> Participating hosts (10 -> 10)
> ------------------------------
> 
>   No changes in participating hosts
> 
> Possible new issues
> -------------------
> 
>   Here are the unknown changes that may have been introduced in IGTPW_12677_full:
> 
> ### IGT changes ###
> 
> #### Possible regressions ####
> 
>   * igt at gem_exec_big@single:
>     - shard-tglu:         NOTRUN -> [ABORT][1]
>    [1]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/IGTPW_12677/shard-tglu-2/igt@gem_exec_big@single.html

This is unrelated. Please fix and re-run.

[...]

Thank you,

Peter


More information about the igt-dev mailing list