Re: ✗ i915.CI.Full: failure for Integrate kmemleak scans in igt_runner (rev5)
Peter Senna Tschudin
peter.senna at linux.intel.com
Wed Mar 5 07:44:46 UTC 2025
Dear i915,
On 05.03.2025 08:28, Patchwork wrote:
> == Series Details ==
>
> Series: Integrate kmemleak scans in igt_runner (rev5)
> URL : https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/series/143996/
> State : failure
>
> == Summary ==
>
> CI Bug Log - changes from CI_DRM_16199_full -> IGTPW_12677_full
> ====================================================
>
> Summary
> -------
>
> **FAILURE**
>
> Serious unknown changes coming with IGTPW_12677_full absolutely need to be
> verified manually.
>
> If you think the reported changes have nothing to do with the changes
> introduced in IGTPW_12677_full, please notify your bug team (I915-ci-infra at lists.freedesktop.org) to allow them
> to document this new failure mode, which will reduce false positives in CI.
>
> External URL: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/IGTPW_12677/index.html
>
> Participating hosts (10 -> 10)
> ------------------------------
>
> No changes in participating hosts
>
> Possible new issues
> -------------------
>
> Here are the unknown changes that may have been introduced in IGTPW_12677_full:
>
> ### IGT changes ###
>
> #### Possible regressions ####
>
> * igt at gem_exec_big@single:
> - shard-tglu: NOTRUN -> [ABORT][1]
> [1]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/IGTPW_12677/shard-tglu-2/igt@gem_exec_big@single.html
This is unrelated. Please fix and re-run.
[...]
Thank you,
Peter
More information about the igt-dev
mailing list