Re: ✗ i915.CI.BAT: failure for runner/kmemleak: Remove unnecessary lseek() calls

[Peter Senna Tschudin]

Dear I15,

On 11.03.2025 02:47, Patchwork wrote:
> == Series Details ==
> 
> Series: runner/kmemleak: Remove unnecessary lseek() calls
> URL   : https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/series/146105/
> State : failure
> 
> == Summary ==
> 
> CI Bug Log - changes from IGT_8270 -> IGTPW_12739
> ====================================================
> 
> Summary
> -------
> 
>   **FAILURE**
> 
>   Serious unknown changes coming with IGTPW_12739 absolutely need to be
>   verified manually.
>   
>   If you think the reported changes have nothing to do with the changes
>   introduced in IGTPW_12739, please notify your bug team (I915-ci-infra at lists.freedesktop.org) to allow them
>   to document this new failure mode, which will reduce false positives in CI.
> 
>   External URL: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/IGTPW_12739/index.html
> 
> Participating hosts (44 -> 43)
> ------------------------------
> 
>   Missing    (1): fi-snb-2520m 
> 
> Possible new issues
> -------------------
> 
>   Here are the unknown changes that may have been introduced in IGTPW_12739:
> 
> ### IGT changes ###
> 
> #### Possible regressions ####
> 
>   * igt at i915_selftest@live:
>     - fi-tgl-1115g4:      [PASS][1] -> [DMESG-FAIL][2] +1 other test dmesg-fail
>    [1]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/IGT_8270/fi-tgl-1115g4/igt@i915_selftest@live.html
>    [2]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/IGTPW_12739/fi-tgl-1115g4/igt@i915_selftest@live.html
> These are unrelated. Please fix and resubmit.

Thank you,

Peter



[...]