[PATCH i-g-t v3 2/3] tests/intel/xe_pmu: Add engine activity test for all functions

Umesh Nerlige Ramappa umesh.nerlige.ramappa at intel.com
Mon Mar 24 17:25:33 UTC 2025


On Mon, Mar 24, 2025 at 10:54:33AM +0530, Riana Tauro wrote:
>Hi Umesh
>
>On 3/22/2025 2:15 AM, Umesh Nerlige Ramappa wrote:
>>On Fri, Mar 21, 2025 at 04:39:57PM +0530, Riana Tauro wrote:
>>>Provision and enable 2 VFs with execution quantum and scheduling policy
>>>set. Add a test that runs workload on all functions simultaneously and
>>>validates that all engines are equally and fully loaded for the
>>>entire execution quantum of the function
>>>
>>>v2: add a different function for function config
>>>   add function details to log
>>>   move pmu_fd to struct
>>>   enable and provision VF's (Umesh)
>>>
>>>v3: split patches
>>>   move exec_quantum to variables
>>>   skip test if vfs are already provisioned
>>>   fix assert (Umesh)
>>>
>>>Signed-off-by: Riana Tauro <riana.tauro at intel.com>
>>>---
>>>tests/intel/xe_pmu.c | 129 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>>>1 file changed, 129 insertions(+)
>>>
>>>diff --git a/tests/intel/xe_pmu.c b/tests/intel/xe_pmu.c
>>>index f0959abe2..9a1f9b39e 100644
>>>--- a/tests/intel/xe_pmu.c
>>>+++ b/tests/intel/xe_pmu.c
>>>@@ -14,11 +14,13 @@
>>>
>>>#include "igt.h"
>>>#include "igt_perf.h"
>>>+#include "igt_sriov_device.h"
>>>#include "igt_sysfs.h"
>>>
>>>#include "xe/xe_gt.h"
>>>#include "xe/xe_ioctl.h"
>>>#include "xe/xe_spin.h"
>>>+#include "xe/xe_sriov_provisioning.h"
>>>
>>>#define SLEEP_DURATION 2 /* in seconds */
>>>/* flag masks */
>>>@@ -124,6 +126,12 @@ static uint64_t get_event_config(unsigned int 
>>>gt, struct drm_xe_engine_class_ins
>>>    return pmu_config;
>>>}
>>>
>>>+static uint64_t get_event_config_fn(unsigned int gt, int function,
>>>+                    struct drm_xe_engine_class_instance *eci, 
>>>const char *event)
>>>+{
>>>+    return get_event_config(gt, eci, event) | 
>>>add_format_config("function", function);
>>>+}
>>>+
>>>/**
>>> * SUBTEST: engine-activity-idle
>>> * Description: Test to validate engine activity shows no load when idle
>>>@@ -187,6 +195,73 @@ static void engine_activity(int fd, struct 
>>>drm_xe_engine_class_instance *eci, un
>>>        igt_assert(!engine_active_ticks);
>>>}
>>>
>>>+/**
>>>+ * SUBTEST: all-fn-engine-activity-load
>>>+ * Description: Test to validate engine activity by running load 
>>>on all functions simultaneously
>>>+ */
>>>+static void engine_activity_all_fn(int fd, struct 
>>>drm_xe_engine_class_instance *eci, int num_fns)
>>>+{
>>>+    uint64_t config, engine_active_ticks, engine_total_ticks;
>>>+    uint64_t after[2 * num_fns], before[2 * num_fns];
>>>+    struct pmu_function {
>>>+        struct xe_cork *cork;
>>>+        uint32_t vm;
>>>+        uint64_t pmu_fd[2];
>>>+        int fd;
>>>+    } fn[num_fns];
>>>+    int i;
>>>+
>>>+    fn[0].pmu_fd[0] = -1;
>>>+    for (i = 0; i < num_fns; i++) {
>>
>>nit:
>>In the for loops,
>>struct pmu_function *f = &fn[i];
>>and then you can use f-> below instead of fn[i].
>will add this>
>>>+        config = get_event_config_fn(eci->gt_id, i, eci, "engine- 
>>>active-ticks");
>>>+        fn[i].pmu_fd[0] = open_group(fd, config, fn[0].pmu_fd[0]);
>>>+
>>>+        config = get_event_config_fn(eci->gt_id, i, eci, "engine- 
>>>total-ticks");
>>>+        fn[i].pmu_fd[1] = open_group(fd, config, fn[0].pmu_fd[0]);
>>>+
>>>+        if (i > 0)
>>>+            fn[i].fd = igt_sriov_open_vf_drm_device(fd, i);
>>>+        else
>>>+            fn[i].fd = fd;
>>>+
>>>+        igt_assert_fd(fn[i].fd);
>>>+
>>>+        fn[i].vm = xe_vm_create(fn[i].fd, 0, 0);
>>>+        fn[i].cork = xe_cork_create_opts(fn[i].fd, eci, fn[i].vm, 1, 1);
>>>+        xe_cork_sync_start(fn[i].fd, fn[i].cork);
>>>+    }
>>>+
>>>+    pmu_read_multi(fn[0].pmu_fd[0], 2 * num_fns, before);
>>>+    usleep(SLEEP_DURATION * USEC_PER_SEC);
>>>+    pmu_read_multi(fn[0].pmu_fd[0], 2 * num_fns, after);
>>>+
>>>+    for (i = 0; i < num_fns; i++) {
>>>+        int idx = i * 2;
>>>+
>>>+        xe_cork_sync_end(fn[i].fd, fn[i].cork);
>>>+        engine_active_ticks = after[idx] - before[idx];
>>>+        engine_total_ticks = after[idx + 1] - before[idx + 1];
>>>+
>>>+        igt_debug("[%d] Engine active ticks: after %ld, before 
>>>%ld delta %ld\n", i,
>>>+              after[idx], before[idx], engine_active_ticks);
>>>+        igt_debug("[%d] Engine total ticks: after %ld, before %ld 
>>>delta %ld\n", i,
>>>+              after[idx + 1], before[idx + 1], engine_total_ticks);
>>>+
>>>+        if (fn[i].cork)
>>>+            xe_cork_destroy(fn[i].fd, fn[i].cork);
>>>+
>>>+        xe_vm_destroy(fn[i].fd, fn[i].vm);
>>>+
>>>+        close(fn[i].pmu_fd[0]);
>>>+        close(fn[i].pmu_fd[1]);
>>>+
>>>+        if (i > 0)
>>>+            close(fn[i].fd);
>>>+
>>>+        assert_within_epsilon(engine_active_ticks, 
>>>engine_total_ticks, tolerance);
>>>+    }
>>>+}
>>>+
>>>/**
>>> * SUBTEST: gt-c6-idle
>>> * Description: Basic residency test to validate idle residency
>>>@@ -225,6 +300,33 @@ static void test_gt_c6_idle(int xe, unsigned int gt)
>>>    close(pmu_fd);
>>>}
>>>
>>>+static unsigned int enable_and_provision_vfs(int fd)
>>>+{
>>>+    unsigned int gt, num_vfs;
>>>+    int pf_exec_quantum = 64, vf_exec_quantum = 32, vf;
>>>+
>>>+    /* Enable VF's */
>>>+    igt_sriov_disable_driver_autoprobe(fd);
>>>+    igt_sriov_enable_vfs(fd, 2);
>>>+    num_vfs = igt_sriov_get_enabled_vfs(fd);
>>>+    igt_require(num_vfs == 2);
>>>+
>>>+    /* Set 32ms for VF execution quantum and 64ms for PF 
>>>execution quantum */
>>>+    xe_for_each_gt(fd, gt) {
>>>+        xe_sriov_set_sched_if_idle(fd, gt, 0);
>>
>>Looking at patch 3, for the new test, the sched if idle is set to 
>>true after binding the VFs. That's a slightly different use case 
>>compared to the sched_if_idle = false case where vfs are bound 
>>later.
>>
>Even if sched if idle is set after vfs are bound, test is working as 
>expected. And the test which runs simulatenously on all engines 
>doesn't require the sched-if-idle case as there is no difference wrt 
>to scheduling policy
>
>So added it only for one and set it after provisioning
>
>>I was imagining that the provisioning would be separate for the 2 tests
>>that depend on sched_if_idle. Each test (with different provisioning 
>>params)
>>may need to provision the VFs separately.
>>
>>More details in the next comment.
>>
>>>+        for (int fn = 0; fn <= num_vfs; fn++)
>>>+            xe_sriov_set_exec_quantum_ms(fd, fn, gt, fn ? 
>>>vf_exec_quantum :
>>>+                             pf_exec_quantum);
>>>+    }
>>>+
>>>+    /* probe VFs */
>>>+    igt_sriov_enable_driver_autoprobe(fd);
>>>+    for (vf = 1; vf <= num_vfs; vf++)
>>>+        igt_sriov_bind_vf_drm_driver(fd, vf);
>>>+
>>>+    return num_vfs;
>>>+}
>>>+
>>>igt_main
>>>{
>>>    int fd, gt;
>>>@@ -254,6 +356,33 @@ igt_main
>>>    test_each_engine("engine-activity-load", fd, eci)
>>>        engine_activity(fd, eci, TEST_LOAD);
>>>
>>>+    igt_subtest_group {
>>>+        bool autoprobe;
>>>+        unsigned int num_fns;
>>>+
>>>+        igt_fixture {
>>>+            igt_require(igt_sriov_is_pf(fd));
>>>+            igt_require(igt_sriov_get_enabled_vfs(fd) == 0);
>>>+            autoprobe = igt_sriov_is_driver_autoprobe_enabled(fd);
>>>+            num_fns = enable_and_provision_vfs(fd) + 1;
>>
>>0) Move the igt_require lines and autoprobe line to
>>enable_and_provision_vfs(). Maybe autoprobe can be global.
>>
>Will add this> 1) the enable_and_provision_vfs can take params - 
>num_vfs, pf_quanta,
>>vf_quanta and sched_if_idle.
>>
>>2) Since we just want to modify the sched_if_idle param, we could have 2
>>subtest groups.The subtest fixture runs for every non-sriov test from the file in CI.
>So even if i run the native subtest, all the provisioning and 
>disabling VF's will run on sriov supported machines.

ok, I guess the fixtures will run in all subtest groups. That's messy.  
Also, since this is passing, I guess the order of enabling sched_if_idle 
is not critical. You can leave it as is then. This is

Reviewed-by: Umesh Nerlige Ramappa <umesh.nerlige.ramappa at intel.com>

Thanks,
Umesh


>
>Will check what difference will it be if we set sched-if-idle after 
>enabling.
>
>Thanks
>Riana>
>>>+        }
>>>+
>>>+        igt_describe("Validate engine activity on all functions");
>>>+        test_each_engine("all-fn-engine-activity-load", fd, eci)
>>>+            engine_activity_all_fn(fd, eci, num_fns);
>>>+
>>>+        igt_fixture {
>>>+            igt_sriov_disable_vfs(fd);
>>>+            /* abort to avoid execution of next tests with 
>>>enabled VFs */
>>>+            igt_abort_on_f(igt_sriov_get_enabled_vfs(fd) > 0,
>>>+                       "Failed to disable VF(s)");
>>>+            autoprobe ? igt_sriov_enable_driver_autoprobe(fd) :
>>>+                    igt_sriov_disable_driver_autoprobe(fd);
>>>+            igt_abort_on_f(autoprobe != 
>>>igt_sriov_is_driver_autoprobe_enabled(fd),
>>>+                       "Failed to restore sriov_drivers_autoprobe 
>>>value\n");
>>
>>everything in this fixture could just be part of a helper, for 
>>example - disable_provisioned_vfs()
>>I imagine things would look like this:
>>
>>igt_subtest_group { /* sched_if_idle = 0 */
>>     unsigned int num_fns;
>>
>>     igt_fixture num_fns = enable_and_provision_vfs(... sched_if_idle = 0);
>>
>>     igt_describe("Validate engine activity on all functions");
>>     test_each_engine("all-fn-engine-activity-load", fd, eci)
>>         engine_activity_all_fn(fd, eci, num_fns);
>>
>>     igt_describe("Validate per-function engine activity");
>>     test_each_engine("fn-engine-activity-load", fd, eci)
>>         for (int fn = 0; fn < num_fns; fn++)
>>             engine_activity_fn(fd, eci, fn);
>>
>>     igt_fixture disable_provisioned_vfs(...);
>>}
>>
>>igt_subtest_group { /* sched_if_idle = 1 */
>>     unsigned int num_fns;
>>
>>     igt_fixture num_fns = enable_and_provision_vfs(... sched_if_idle = 1);
>>
>>     igt_describe("Validate per-function engine activity when 
>>sched-if- idle is set");
>>     test_each_engine("fn-engine-activity-sched-if-idle", fd, eci) {
>>         for (int fn = 0; fn < num_fns; fn++)
>>             engine_activity_fn(fd, eci, fn);
>>
>>     igt_fixture disable_provisioned_vfs(...);
>>}
>>
>>Optionally, you could have the 
>>all-fn-engine-activity-load-sched-if-idle in the
>>second group as well.
>>
>>Thanks,
>>Umesh
>>
>>>+        }
>>>+    }
>>>+
>>>    igt_fixture {
>>>        close(fd);
>>>    }
>>>-- 
>>>2.47.1
>>>
>


More information about the igt-dev mailing list