[PATCH i-g-t v1] tests/kms_async_flips: Add psr async flip subtest

[Karthik B S]

Hi Santhosh,

On 3/24/2025 9:43 PM, Santhosh Reddy Guddati wrote:
> Add a new subtest to verify async flips does not cause PSR exit.
> Enable PSR and execute async flips to verify system remains in
> PSR mode after async flips.
>
> Signed-off-by: Santhosh Reddy Guddati <santhosh.reddy.guddati at intel.com>
> ---
>   tests/kms_async_flips.c | 38 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>   1 file changed, 38 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/tests/kms_async_flips.c b/tests/kms_async_flips.c
> index da426f753..cf6b63b3e 100644
> --- a/tests/kms_async_flips.c
> +++ b/tests/kms_async_flips.c
> @@ -85,6 +85,9 @@
>    *
>    * SUBTEST: async-flip-suspend-resume
>    * Description: Verify the async flip functionality with suspend and resume cycle
> + *
> + * SUBTEST: psr-async-flip
> + * Description: Verify that async flips do not cause PSR exit
>    */
>   
>   #define CURSOR_POS 128
> @@ -102,6 +105,7 @@ IGT_TEST_DESCRIPTION("Test asynchronous page flips.");
>   
>   typedef struct {
>   	int drm_fd;
> +	int debugfs_fd;
>   	uint32_t crtc_id;
>   	uint32_t refresh_rate;
>   	struct igt_fb bufs[NUM_FBS];
> @@ -740,6 +744,33 @@ static void run_test_with_modifiers(data_t *data, void (*test)(data_t *))
>   	}
>   }
>   
> +static bool psr_wait_entry_if_enabled(data_t *data)
> +{
> +	igt_skip_on_f(!is_psr_enable_possible(data->drm_fd, PSR_MODE_1),
> +		      "enable_psr modparam doesn't allow PSR mode 1\n");
> +
> +	return psr_wait_entry(data->debugfs_fd, PSR_MODE_1, data->output);
> +}
> +
> +static void test_psr_async_flip(data_t *data)
> +{
> +	if (!psr_sink_support(data->drm_fd, data->debugfs_fd, PSR_MODE_1, data->output))
> +		igt_skip("PSR mode 1 is not supported on this output\n");
> +
> +	psr_enable(data->drm_fd, data->debugfs_fd, PSR_MODE_1, NULL);
> +	igt_display_commit(&data->display);
> +
> +	/* Confirm PSR entry before starting async flips */
> +	igt_assert_f(psr_wait_entry_if_enabled(data),
> +			 "PSR is not enabled before async flip test\n");
> +
> +	test_async_flip(data);
> +
> +	/* Confirm PSR is still active after async flips */
> +	igt_assert_f(psr_wait_entry_if_enabled(data),
> +			 "PSR is not enabled after async flip test\n");

We need to be using the 'psr_active_check' here directly instead of 
waiting for PSR entry as this contradicts the comment above the check.

This test will mostly fail once we have that check async flips should 
ideally trigger PSR exit?

Thanks,
Karthik.B.S
> +}
> +
>   static data_t data;
>   
>   igt_main
> @@ -748,6 +779,7 @@ igt_main
>   
>   	igt_fixture {
>   		data.drm_fd = drm_open_driver_master(DRIVER_ANY);
> +		data.debugfs_fd = igt_debugfs_dir(data.drm_fd);
>   		kmstest_set_vt_graphics_mode();
>   		igt_display_require(&data.display, data.drm_fd);
>   		igt_display_require_output(&data.display);
> @@ -896,6 +928,12 @@ igt_main
>   		run_test(&data, test_async_flip);
>   	}
>   
> +	igt_describe("Verify that async flips do not cause PSR exit");
> +	igt_subtest_with_dynamic("psr-async-flip") {
> +		data.atomic_path = false;
> +		run_test(&data, test_psr_async_flip);
> +	}
> +
>   	igt_fixture {
>   		for (i = 0; i < NUM_FBS; i++)
>   			igt_remove_fb(data.drm_fd, &data.bufs[i]);