Re: ✗ Xe.CI.Full: failure for tests/intel/sec_xe_exec_queue_timeslice_abuse: Validate the Impact of Timeslice Abuse on Exec Queues (rev4)

[Peter Senna Tschudin]

Dear I915,

On 5/9/2025 5:39 AM, Patchwork wrote:
> == Series Details ==
> 
> Series: tests/intel/sec_xe_exec_queue_timeslice_abuse: Validate the Impact of Timeslice Abuse on Exec Queues (rev4)
> URL   : https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/series/148581/
> State : failure
> 
> == Summary ==
> 
> CI Bug Log - changes from XEIGT_8357_FULL -> XEIGTPW_13095_FULL
> ====================================================
> 
> Summary
> -------
> 
>   **FAILURE**
> 
>   Serious unknown changes coming with XEIGTPW_13095_FULL absolutely need to be
>   verified manually.
>   
>   If you think the reported changes have nothing to do with the changes
>   introduced in XEIGTPW_13095_FULL, please notify your bug team (I915-ci-infra at lists.freedesktop.org) to allow them
>   to document this new failure mode, which will reduce false positives in CI.
> 
>   
> 
> Participating hosts (4 -> 3)
> ------------------------------
> 
>   Missing    (1): shard-adlp 
> 
> Possible new issues
> -------------------
> 
>   Here are the unknown changes that may have been introduced in XEIGTPW_13095_FULL:
> 
> ### IGT changes ###
> 
> #### Possible regressions ####
> 
>   * igt at kms_bw@linear-tiling-1-displays-3840x2160p:
>     - shard-lnl:          [PASS][1] -> [ABORT][2]
>    [1]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/intel-xe/IGT_8357/shard-lnl-5/igt@kms_bw@linear-tiling-1-displays-3840x2160p.html
>    [2]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/intel-xe/IGTPW_13095/shard-lnl-7/igt@kms_bw@linear-tiling-1-displays-3840x2160p.html
> 
>   * igt at kms_setmode@invalid-clone-single-crtc-stealing at pipe-a-hdmi-a-6-dp-4:
>     - shard-dg2-set2:     [PASS][3] -> ([PASS][4], [ABORT][5]) +1 other test ( 1 abort, 1 pass )
>    [3]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/intel-xe/IGT_8357/shard-dg2-433/igt@kms_setmode@invalid-clone-single-crtc-stealing@pipe-a-hdmi-a-6-dp-4.html
>    [4]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/intel-xe/IGTPW_13095/shard-dg2-464/igt@kms_setmode@invalid-clone-single-crtc-stealing@pipe-a-hdmi-a-6-dp-4.html
>    [5]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/intel-xe/IGTPW_13095/shard-dg2-463/igt@kms_setmode@invalid-clone-single-crtc-stealing@pipe-a-hdmi-a-6-dp-4.html
> 
>   * igt at xe_exec_system_allocator@threads-shared-vm-many-large-new-bo-map-nomemset:
>     - shard-lnl:          [PASS][6] -> ([FAIL][7], [FAIL][8])
>    [6]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/intel-xe/IGT_8357/shard-lnl-5/igt@xe_exec_system_allocator@threads-shared-vm-many-large-new-bo-map-nomemset.html
>    [7]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/intel-xe/IGTPW_13095/shard-lnl-5/igt@xe_exec_system_allocator@threads-shared-vm-many-large-new-bo-map-nomemset.html
>    [8]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/intel-xe/IGTPW_13095/shard-lnl-6/igt@xe_exec_system_allocator@threads-shared-vm-many-large-new-bo-map-nomemset.html
> 
>   * igt at xe_fault_injection@inject-fault-probe-function-xe_wa_init:
>     - shard-lnl:          NOTRUN -> ([ABORT][9], [ABORT][10])
>    [9]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/intel-xe/IGTPW_13095/shard-lnl-3/igt@xe_fault_injection@inject-fault-probe-function-xe_wa_init.html
>    [10]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/intel-xe/IGTPW_13095/shard-lnl-7/igt@xe_fault_injection@inject-fault-probe-function-xe_wa_init.html
> 
>   
> #### Warnings ####
> 
>   * igt at kms_plane_multiple@2x-tiling-yf:
>     - shard-bmg:          [SKIP][11] -> ([SKIP][12], [SKIP][13]) ([Intel XE#4596])
>    [11]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/intel-xe/IGT_8357/shard-bmg-7/igt@kms_plane_multiple@2x-tiling-yf.html
>    [12]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/intel-xe/IGTPW_13095/shard-bmg-5/igt@kms_plane_multiple@2x-tiling-yf.html
>    [13]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/intel-xe/IGTPW_13095/shard-bmg-6/igt@kms_plane_multiple@2x-tiling-yf.html

These are unrelated to my change. Thank you.

[...]