[immodule-qt] Completing comments and documents

[YamaKen]

Hi Cougar,

At Tue, 3 Aug 2004 04:33:17 +0000,
liucougar at gmail.com wrote:
> I think I have found the problem: it was not the Qt's fault ;), it was
> a bug in scim-qtimm.
> 
> I hope I have fixed it in svn.

Good news. We are near completion for Qt3.

> Due to performance concern, I use x11EventFilter in scim-qtimm,
> although the eventFilter function behaves exactly the same (I hope).

Is there a considerable performance difference?

> Sorry for borther
> Regards,
> 
> On Thu, 22 Jul 2004 13:35:06 +0900, YamaKen <yamaken at bp.iij4u.or.jp> wrote:
> > At Thu, 22 Jul 2004 02:39:18 +0000,
> > LiuCougar wrote:
> > >
> > > On Thu, 22 Jul 2004 05:52:38 +0900, YamaKen <yamaken at bp.iij4u.or.jp> wrote:
> > > > As I said before, my environment shows no problem as a tested
> > > > result, so I cannot find out what is the problem by myself. What
> > > > I can do is locating the problem by binary problem search
> > > > algorithm based on the facts. Please provide me the freshly
> > > > tested results as fact.
> > > >
> > > > We had eliminated the dependencies about hardware, OS and X by
> > > > sharing the xev result information. What I want to do is to
> > > > eliminate the immodule dependency as second step. We can
> > > > locate the problem step by step as most efficient way.
> > >
> > > thanks for your efforts.
> > >
> > > Sorry for delayed response: I am very busy these days, so the update
> > > of scim-qtimm and skim will be little in coming days.
> > 
> > No problem. I know your active development effort. I thank you
> > for always inspiring me.
> > 
> > > As you do not have this problem, I think you are not the ideal one to
> > > deal with this issue. I will try to fix it after I have some time.
> > 
> > Okay, I'm waiting for it with interest.

mou man tai
Regards,
-------------------------------
YamaKen  yamaken at bp.iij4u.or.jp