[immodule-qt] Re: Re: A "deadline" for development?

[LiuCougar]

On Wed, 04 Aug 2004 11:30:47 +0900, YamaKen <yamaken at bp.iij4u.or.jp> wrote:
> At Wed, 4 Aug 2004 03:00:04 +0100,
> liucougar at gmail.com wrote:
> >
> > On Wed, 04 Aug 2004 10:38:16 +0900, YamaKen <yamaken at bp.iij4u.or.jp> wrote:
> > > At Wed, 4 Aug 2004 01:38:09 +0100,
> > > liucougar at gmail.com wrote:
> > > > BTW: I think it would be good if we publish some kinda of TODO list or
> > > > Roadmap/Release plan on our official site to state what should be done
> > > > before what date etc.
> > >
> > > Sounds good.
> > >
> > > My TODO list is there (although some items are assigned
> > > someone). Cougar, Kazuki, Daisuke, open your list also.
> > Thanks for sharing your todo list. However what I meant is to publish
> > this info in wiki pages of qt-immodule ;)
> 
> Yes, I had already understood your intention. My previous action
> is first step to publish our TODO list.
> 
> > It seems we should set up a "Task" system in which we can state what
> > we would like to do and assign it to someone. After one task is
> > finished we can just mark it in this system.
> >
> > AFAIK, FD.o does not provide this facility (SF.net does).
> >
> > Then what's your opinion?
> 
> We can use freedesktop's Bugzilla facility to manage TODO items,
> although it is called as a bug tracking system. See uim's
> bugzilla as example.
> 
> http://freedesktop.org/bugzilla/buglist.cgi?query_format=specific&order=relevance+desc&bug_status=__open__&product=UIM&content=
Yeap, a good idea. It has all the required features.

Then next we should fill our "bug list" ourselves... Ah oh, I just
find out that imm-qt does not appear in the FD's bugzilla... we have
another issue of higher priority to deal with first...

-- 
"People's characters are strengthened through struggle against
difficulties; they are weakened by comfort."
- Old Chinese adage