[immodule-qt] Completing comments and documents

[LiuCougar]

On Wed, 04 Aug 2004 11:42:00 +0900, YamaKen <yamaken at bp.iij4u.or.jp> wrote:
> At Wed, 4 Aug 2004 03:06:38 +0100,
> liucougar at gmail.com wrote:
> >
> > On Wed, 04 Aug 2004 10:58:03 +0900, YamaKen <yamaken at bp.iij4u.or.jp> wrote:
> > > I can understand your thought about simplicity. Yes,
> > > imtermediate Qt keyevent is less straightforward for SCIM
> > > because keycodes of SCIM is based on X keycodes. So your
> > > implementation is reasonable because there is no other
> > > platforms are available for immodule except for X11.
> > you are right, but in fact, I just fixed the problem which prevents
> > scim-qtimm from normal functioning without x11EventFilter.
> 
> I've understood that some difficulties are existing without
> x11EventFilter. I'll look at your code later.
Yeap, I had some real difficulties if only QEvent are utilized.
Finally, I got this solution: with some very tricky work around to
overcome the "unfriendly" QKeyEvent.

> > > But what I want to know is whether 'faster' is actually sensible
> > > by human or not. If sensible, it may be indicating
> > > implementation error of our code. Otherwise, the performance
> > > difference is not important.
> > In my box, I didn't notice any differences ;)
> 
> Okay, I'm remembering only 'normal functioning without
> x11EventFilter' as a requirement.
I tried my best to achieve this, and luckily I found the right way at last

-- 
"People's characters are strengthened through struggle against
difficulties; they are weakened by comfort."
- Old Chinese adage