[immodule-qt] Re: [i18n] Re: Updated: qt-immodule

[Zhe Su]

Hi,

If you use scim-uim + uim, then uim-applet is not necessary anymore.

Regards
James Su

On Wed, 04 Aug 2004 16:43:25 +0200, Thierry Vignaud
<tvignaud at mandrakesoft.com> wrote:
> UTUMI Hirosi <utuhiro78 at yahoo.co.jp> writes:
> 
> > > > > does XIM mode works smoothly when there's no qt-immodule?
> > > >
> > > > Qt-immodule doesn't influence XIM.
> > >
> > > what i intended to means: if we dot do input through qt-immodule,
> > > will it works smoothly throuh xim (aka does current scim and uim
> > > support xim) ?
> >
> > SCIM supports XIM well, but UIM's XIM support is broken.
> > (Note: "scim-xim +UIM" work fine.)
> 
> that's fine then since:
> - japanese requires scim-uim uim-applet packages
> - korean requires ami package (but soon scim and scim-hangul instead)
> - chinese requires scim-chinese scim-tables packages
> 
> > Most kde users type i18n words with "scim-xim +UIM" in Mandrake, so
> > they don't need/test Qt-immodule.
> 
> let's say this'll be the next leading step for mdk10.1 and kde-3.3.2
> 
> we still have improved regarding CJK support (though there seems we
> can improve further for other language for which scim/uim provides
> input method)
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> immodule-qt mailing list
> immodule-qt at freedesktop.org
> http://freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/immodule-qt
>