[immodule-qt] Re: Re: A "deadline" for development?
YamaKen
yamaken at bp.iij4u.or.jp
Thu Aug 5 04:48:15 EEST 2004
Hi Kazuki,
At Thu, 5 Aug 2004 08:27:31 +0900,
mover at hct.zaq.ne.jp wrote:
> I have a tough time to port X's parser to Qt.
> I've already created the sample program (attached), but have some problems.
Your experience will turn into your programming skill. Be happy :)
> The parsed result comes as X's "KeySym", so it needs to exchange "KeySym" to
> Qt's keycode.
> Since Qt's doesn't distinguish Qt::Key_A, and Qt::Key_a, I decided to use
> character code based composing tables like this. (NOTE that this is of course
> test table). This means it nees to convert Qt's keycode to character code.
>
> 117 |static const ComposeTableElement defaultTable[] = {
> 118 | // test entries
> 119 | { {'A' , ' ', 0, 0, 0, 0}, 'a' },
> 120 | { {'a' , ' ', 0, 0, 0, 0}, 'b' },
> 121 |}
I've read almost code of QSimpleInputContext. One question. What
TODO items are remaining except for table translation?
At least, you have to ensure that there is no conflict between
Qt::Key and Unicode. For example, deadkeys are conflicting with
Ethiopic Unicode characters for now.
To ensure it, you should use a macro such as following. It
ensures that the unitized qkey will not conflict with any
Unicode or Qt4 keycode.
#define UNITIZE(qkey) (0x02000000 | qkey)
> One solution to deal with this is to prepare the hash table of keyname and
> character code like /usr/lib/X11/XKeysymDB but this requires to maintain this
> list, so the merit of importing parser becomes subtle.
I don't think that maintaining the DB is hard. Because keysym
definition is highly stable than composing table.
> To conclude, I think it costs high to merge X's parser to Qt.
> Any opinion?
I think it is a most cheaper way.
- Inventing another table syntax will greatly costs us anything
- Adopting another composing table syntax from another product
will cost us something as same as X
- Convert some composing table into sourcecode form statically
for QSimpleInputContext is a possible alternative way. But it
will cost us updating and extending the composing table
forever
I'll try to the importing if you are not being happy with doing
it.
-------------------------------
YamaKen yamaken at bp.iij4u.or.jp
More information about the immodule-qt
mailing list