[immodule-qt] Send IMEnd event on reset

[Lars Knoll]

On Monday 10 January 2005 00:13, Choe Hwanjin wrote:
> On Sun, 9 Jan 2005 17:38:32 +0100, Lars Knoll <lars at trolltech.com> wrote:
> > On Sunday 09 January 2005 14:48, Daisuke Kameda wrote:
> > > Choe Hwanjin <choe.hwanjin at gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > > But, I think that we should leave the processing when receiving
> > > > > reset to XIM server. In my memory, since the specification of
> > > > > XmbResetIC is not clear, last preedit string may be commited
> > > > > doubly.
> > > >
> > > > I think this problem will be happen only when the xim implementation
> > > > commit the preedit
> > > > string on XmbResetIC and return the preedit string. In other cases,
> > > > double commit will not
> > > > happen. I think many xim implemetation will not commit preedit string
> > > > and then return
> > > > the preedit string on Reset function.
> > >
> > > I considered many things or investigated.
> > > As the conclusion, I think that change should be adopted.
> > >
> > > I think that your opinion is right.
> > >
> > > And, I think that operation at the time of reset should be dependent
> > > only on input method (framework). However, it is also required to be
> > > the same operation as other frameworks.
> > >
> > > Then, after investigation, it turned out that it is committed in gtk+
> > > application at least. So, it will be appropriate to follow this action.
> > >
> > > Lars, please adopt the patch in Qt4.
> >
> > I'm not sure I understand this as I seem to not have gotten the original
> > mail from Choe Hwanjin and never saw any patch. Please send me this
> > information once again.
>
> Maybe you are not a member of this list.
> You can read my mail here:
> http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/immodule-qt/2004-December/000624.html

Thanks, I am subscribed to this list, but somehow this mail never got into my 
mailbox.

Best regards,
Lars