[immodule-qt] Re: Question about deletion of the method of QInputContext

[Mike FABIAN]

Choe Hwanjin <choe.hwanjin at gmail.com> さんは書きました:

> On Tue, 11 Jan 2005 14:11:31 +0900, Daisuke Kameda
> <kaminmat at cc.rim.or.jp> wrote:
>> On Thursday 06 January 2005 02:15, Lars Knoll wrote:

[...]

>> > So for XIM, focus changes do not any longer cause the preedit string to be
>> > reset, but it is preserved until the widget regains focus. Please try what
>> > I have implemented for XIM together with e.g. kinput2 and tell me if this
>> > is the wanted behaviour.
>> 
>> I'm considering well about this.
>> 
>> Although present operation is good for Japanese, I think that
>> the operation which doesn't reset is not always required.
>> If anything, there must be more many languages for which
>> it is good behavior not doing so.
>> 
>> Probably, this point at least should be taken into consideration.
>
> I think this problem is important. Reseting ic on focus out event is a
> needed feature for korean, and I think other languages too.
> In some cases the last preedit string may be lost.
>
> And I really curious about that.
> Kameda san, let me know how japanese input text usually, and why that
> feature is needed.
> I don't still understand why :)

I don't understand why that is needed either. To the contrary, I find
it very annoying when a preedit string is preserved on focus change
and an old preedit string is recovered if the widget regains focus.
I think it is more natural when the preedit string is committed on
focus change.

-- 
Mike FABIAN   <mfabian at suse.de>   http://www.suse.de/~mfabian
睡眠不足はいい仕事の敵だ。