[PATCH libevdev 2/2] Reintroduce -fstack-protector
walters at verbum.org
Fri Sep 13 08:21:08 PDT 2013
On Fri, 2013-09-13 at 17:15 +0200, David Herrmann wrote:
> Thanks for tracking it down. I wonder why it didn't fail for anybody
> else, though. More importantly, we don't do static linking or similar
> in tools/, so why doesn't ld correctly link and resolve the symbols?
I think this may come down to whether or not libc.so itself is built
with stack protector or not.
> Anyway, it's missing your Signed-off-by line, could you provide it as
> a response here? (same rules as for the kernel apply)
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Size: 742 bytes
Desc: not available
More information about the Input-tools