<html> <head> <base href="https://bugs.freedesktop.org/"> </head> <body> <div> <a class="bz_bug_link bz_status_NEW " title="NEW - Regression: GLB 2.7 segfaults due to bogus linker precision error (259fc505) on dead variable" href="https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=97532#c12">Comment # 12</a> on <a class="bz_bug_link bz_status_NEW " title="NEW - Regression: GLB 2.7 segfaults due to bogus linker precision error (259fc505) on dead variable" href="https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=97532">bug 97532</a> from <a class="email" href="mailto:kenneth@whitecape.org" title="Kenneth Graunke <kenneth@whitecape.org>"> Kenneth Graunke</a> <pre>(In reply to Eero Tamminen from <a href="show_bug.cgi?id=97532#c11">comment #11</a>) > The reason why I don't think there should be an error about the first case > is that it can easily be a regression on fully functional programs (like > here), and those regressions will go unnoticed because Mesa's regular > testing is mainly for GL, there's not much testing for GLES (WebGL etc). That's not true at all...we run dEQP and the ES conformance suite on every commit. That's something like 90,000 GLES-only tests, which is definitely tests than we run for GL. You have a broken application. If the latest release works, you should upgrade. If it doesn't work, we should contact Kishonti and ask them to fix it. It's a simple fix and I believe they would be responsive.</pre> </div> <hr> You are receiving this mail because: <ul> <li>You are the QA Contact for the bug.</li> </ul> </body> </html>